A Risk-Based Universal Calibration Interval Model Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Sustainable manufacturing requires modern intelligent approaches to monitoring products of the manufacturing process. An integral part of intelligent manufacturing is the measurement of geometric parameters of products, which allows diagnosing the state of the manufacturing process, optimizing it and predicting its further development. For these reasons, it is necessary to monitor the condition of measuring instruments, as decision-making is based on the data provided by them. Calibration intervals of measuring instruments are commonly defined using fixed time-based rules that are not explicitly linked to measurement uncertainty growth or conformity risk. This practice may lead to either unnecessary recalibration or an increased probability of using out-of-tolerance instruments. In this study, a Monte Carlo-based methodology for determining recalibration intervals is proposed, in which recalibration decisions are derived from the probabilistic evolution of measurement error over time. Measurement uncertainty is modeled as a time-dependent stochastic process combining calibration uncertainty, drift behavior, and repeatability. Monte Carlo simulation is used to propagate uncertainty and to estimate both the expanded uncertainty and the probability that the measurement error exceeds the maximum permissible error (MPE). The recalibration interval is defined as the earliest time at which this probability exceeds a predefined acceptable risk threshold. A numerical experiment using realistic synthetic data representative of a typical dimensional measuring instrument demonstrates that probability-based and uncertainty-based criteria may lead to substantially different recalibration intervals. The results confirm that risk-informed recalibration intervals provide a more transparent and metrologically justified alternative to fixed schedules while remaining fully compatible with ISO/IEC 17025 and GUM principles. The proposed approach is instrument-agnostic and readily applicable in calibration laboratories and industrial measurement systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052230
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Risk-Based Universal Calibration Interval Model Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Tatiana Kelemenová, DMYTRO MALAKHOV, Michal Kelemen
Applied Sciences
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

A Risk-Based Universal Calibration Interval Model Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Tatiana Kelemenová, DMYTRO MALAKHOV, Michal Kelemen
article en

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing requires modern intelligent approaches to monitoring products of the manufacturing process. An integral part of intelligent manufacturing is the measurement of geometric parameters of products, which allows diagnosing the state of the manufacturing process, optimizing it and predicting its further development. For these reasons, it is necessary to monitor the condition of measuring instruments, as decision-making is based on the data provided by them. Calibration intervals of measuring instruments are commonly defined using fixed time-based rules that are not explicitly linked to measurement uncertainty growth or conformity risk. This practice may lead to either unnecessary recalibration or an increased probability of using out-of-tolerance instruments. In this study, a Monte Carlo-based methodology for determining recalibration intervals is proposed, in which recalibration decisions are derived from the probabilistic evolution of measurement error over time. Measurement uncertainty is modeled as a time-dependent stochastic process combining calibration uncertainty, drift behavior, and repeatability. Monte Carlo simulation is used to propagate uncertainty and to estimate both the expanded uncertainty and the probability that the measurement error exceeds the maximum permissible error (MPE). The recalibration interval is defined as the earliest time at which this probability exceeds a predefined acceptable risk threshold. A numerical experiment using realistic synthetic data representative of a typical dimensional measuring instrument demonstrates that probability-based and uncertainty-based criteria may lead to substantially different recalibration intervals. The results confirm that risk-informed recalibration intervals provide a more transparent and metrologically justified alternative to fixed schedules while remaining fully compatible with ISO/IEC 17025 and GUM principles. The proposed approach is instrument-agnostic and readily applicable in calibration laboratories and industrial measurement systems.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(5)
Technical University of Košice (SK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.