Impact and interplay of ΛCDM analysis choices for LSST cosmic shear

We forecast cosmological parameter constraints for a cosmic shear analysis of the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), defining an analysis framework that can accurately recover the Λ CDM model in the presence of astrophysical and data-related systematics. When accounting for our present uncertainty on the suppression of the non-linear matter power spectrum through baryon feedback, we find that the error on the composite parameter almost doubles compared to an LSST analysis which neglects this astrophysical phenomenon. After the first year of observations, LSST will extend beyond the magnitude limit of existing representative spectroscopic calibration samples, requiring photometric redshifts to be calibrated using an alternative strategy. Adopting literature measurements of the reduced redshift calibration precision found from galaxy cross-correlation techniques, combined with current levels of baryon feedback uncertainty, we forecast final year LSST cosmic shear constraints that barely improve upon the first year analysis. This forecast therefore serves as encouragement to the community to develop methodology and observations to constrain models of baryon feedback and enhance photometric redshift calibration at depths where spectroscopy is unrepresentative. With tight priors on both these systematic terms, we forecast that LSST cosmic shear can deliver constraints on S 8 that are more than five times as constraining as existing cosmic shear surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.168762
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact and interplay of ΛCDM analysis choices for LSST cosmic shear

N. C. Robertson, I. G. McCarthy, J. C. Paine, J. Salcido et al.
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Impact and interplay of ΛCDM analysis choices for LSST cosmic shear

N. C. Robertson, I. G. McCarthy, J. C. Paine, J. Salcido, J. Zuntz, M. P. van Daalen, C. D. Leonard, P. Burger, N. Šarčević, M. Schaller, J. Schaye, C. Heymans, FLAMINGO Team
article en

Abstract

We forecast cosmological parameter constraints for a cosmic shear analysis of the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), defining an analysis framework that can accurately recover the Λ CDM model in the presence of astrophysical and data-related systematics. When accounting for our present uncertainty on the suppression of the non-linear matter power spectrum through baryon feedback, we find that the error on the composite parameter almost doubles compared to an LSST analysis which neglects this astrophysical phenomenon. After the first year of observations, LSST will extend beyond the magnitude limit of existing representative spectroscopic calibration samples, requiring photometric redshifts to be calibrated using an alternative strategy. Adopting literature measurements of the reduced redshift calibration precision found from galaxy cross-correlation techniques, combined with current levels of baryon feedback uncertainty, we forecast final year LSST cosmic shear constraints that barely improve upon the first year analysis. This forecast therefore serves as encouragement to the community to develop methodology and observations to constrain models of baryon feedback and enhance photometric redshift calibration at depths where spectroscopy is unrepresentative. With tight priors on both these systematic terms, we forecast that LSST cosmic shear can deliver constraints on S 8 that are more than five times as constraining as existing cosmic shear surveys.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 9
University of Wyoming (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.