Strategies to Reduce Sulfur Dioxide in Tannat Winemaking: Effects of Chitosan and Lysozyme on Microbial Stability, Composition, and Sensory Profile

Sulfites are the most widely used additives in oenology to prevent oxidation and microbial spoilage. However, concerns about their potential adverse health effects have increased demand for low-sulfite wines. Strategies are required to ensure microbiological stability while preserving wine quality. This study evaluated strategies to reduce or replace added sulfites with chitosan and low doses of lysozyme in Tannat winemaking. It measured their effects on microbial diversity, physicochemical parameters, and sensory attributes. Treatments were vinified in triplicate: reduced sulfites (RS: 30 mg/L), chitosan (C: 100 mg/L), reduced sulfites with chitosan (RS+C: 30 mg/L + 100 mg/L), reduced sulfites with lysozyme (RS+L: 30 mg/L + 5 mg/L), and traditional winemaking (TW: 125 mg/L sulfites). Sulfur dioxide lowered lactic acid bacteria counts, whereas chitosan and lysozyme treatments maintained higher populations. Metagenomic analyses showed that sulfur dioxide reduced bacterial diversity, whereas chitosan promoted a more complex microbiota. Lysozyme selectively reduced lactic acid bacteria, mainly affecting Oenococcus spp. Lower sulfite levels decreased phenolic concentrations, possibly due to reduced protection against oxidation, leading to color differences among treatments. The results indicate that strategies to reduce or replace sulfites influence microbial dynamics, acidity, phenolic structure, and color, highlighting the importance of careful process management to maintain wine quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fermentation
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12030124
Primary Topic
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies to Reduce Sulfur Dioxide in Tannat Winemaking: Effects of Chitosan and Lysozyme on Microbial Stability, Composition, and Sensory Profile

Gustavo González‐Neves, Guzmán Favre, Tamara Fernández-Calero, Hugo Naya et al.
Fermentation
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
article

Strategies to Reduce Sulfur Dioxide in Tannat Winemaking: Effects of Chitosan and Lysozyme on Microbial Stability, Composition, and Sensory Profile

Gustavo González‐Neves, Guzmán Favre, Tamara Fernández-Calero, Hugo Naya, Diego Piccardo, Jorge A. Olivera, Alejandro Cammarota, Yamila Celio-Ackermann, Florencia Pereyra-Farina
article en

Abstract

Sulfites are the most widely used additives in oenology to prevent oxidation and microbial spoilage. However, concerns about their potential adverse health effects have increased demand for low-sulfite wines. Strategies are required to ensure microbiological stability while preserving wine quality. This study evaluated strategies to reduce or replace added sulfites with chitosan and low doses of lysozyme in Tannat winemaking. It measured their effects on microbial diversity, physicochemical parameters, and sensory attributes. Treatments were vinified in triplicate: reduced sulfites (RS: 30 mg/L), chitosan (C: 100 mg/L), reduced sulfites with chitosan (RS+C: 30 mg/L + 100 mg/L), reduced sulfites with lysozyme (RS+L: 30 mg/L + 5 mg/L), and traditional winemaking (TW: 125 mg/L sulfites). Sulfur dioxide lowered lactic acid bacteria counts, whereas chitosan and lysozyme treatments maintained higher populations. Metagenomic analyses showed that sulfur dioxide reduced bacterial diversity, whereas chitosan promoted a more complex microbiota. Lysozyme selectively reduced lactic acid bacteria, mainly affecting Oenococcus spp. Lower sulfite levels decreased phenolic concentrations, possibly due to reduced protection against oxidation, leading to color differences among treatments. The results indicate that strategies to reduce or replace sulfites influence microbial dynamics, acidity, phenolic structure, and color, highlighting the importance of careful process management to maintain wine quality.

FermentationVol. 12(3)
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UY), Institut Pasteur de Montevideo (UY)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.