Impella 5.5 versus HeartMate 3 in Left Ventricular Unloading

The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed) is increasingly used as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in advanced heart failure, yet most studies focus on survival and transition success rather than left ventricular (LV) unloading or valvular effects. This study addresses this gap by comparing Impella 5.5 and HeartMate 3 (HM3, Abbott) in terms of unloading and cardiac support at similar flow rates. We conducted a retrospective study of nine patients who received Impella 5.5 before HM3 implantation. The primary outcome was the degree of LV unloading, as assessed by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). There was no significant reduction in LVEDD from baseline (median 63 mm) to Impella support with medical optimization (median 66 mm; P = .9). In contrast, LVEDD decreased significantly to a median of 55 mm at discharge after HM3 implantation (P = .001). HM3 provides better LV unloading than Impella 5.5 at similar flow rates. These findings suggest that the use of an Impella 5.5, even with medical optimization, may not accurately reflect the degree of unloading achieved with a durable LVAD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The VAD Journal
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58464/2378-2706.1074
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impella 5.5 versus HeartMate 3 in Left Ventricular Unloading

Hannah Frederick, Manjula Ananthram, Erik P. Sorenson, Aakash shah et al.
The VAD Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Impella 5.5 versus HeartMate 3 in Left Ventricular Unloading

Hannah Frederick, Manjula Ananthram, Erik P. Sorenson, Aakash shah, Albert Hicks, Bartley P Griffith, Douglas Tran, H. Todd Massey
article en

Abstract

The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed) is increasingly used as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in advanced heart failure, yet most studies focus on survival and transition success rather than left ventricular (LV) unloading or valvular effects. This study addresses this gap by comparing Impella 5.5 and HeartMate 3 (HM3, Abbott) in terms of unloading and cardiac support at similar flow rates. We conducted a retrospective study of nine patients who received Impella 5.5 before HM3 implantation. The primary outcome was the degree of LV unloading, as assessed by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). There was no significant reduction in LVEDD from baseline (median 63 mm) to Impella support with medical optimization (median 66 mm; P = .9). In contrast, LVEDD decreased significantly to a median of 55 mm at discharge after HM3 implantation (P = .001). HM3 provides better LV unloading than Impella 5.5 at similar flow rates. These findings suggest that the use of an Impella 5.5, even with medical optimization, may not accurately reflect the degree of unloading achieved with a durable LVAD.

The VAD JournalVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.