Integrated latent risk of radiological damage under conflict situation-part I: Concept and approach

The set of protective arrangements implemented in response to uncontrolled radiological releases at nuclear installations greatly benefit from pre-existing provisions taken before the onset of the event during the so-called preparedness phase. Traditionally, emergency preparedness dispositions are implemented based on a single event occurrence at a specific location, i.e. event-oriented preparedness. However, such plans might prove inadequate in scenarios with an increase of accident risk affecting multiple nuclear installations. In these situations, the risk does not arise from an actual ongoing event at a specific installation, but rather from a degradation of the operational context conditions affecting wide areas of a territory hosting several nuclear facilities. In this case, there is no increase in sensitive risk due to an ongoing event but on the perceived, latent risk due a higher likelihood of accident arising from local conflicts or war scenario. Under such circumstances, event-oriented preparedness provisions might be insufficient to address the evolving of the new situation. This paper presents a methodology for the calculation of Emergency Planning Zone distances under conflict situation, based on the quantification of a novel risk figure of merit that integrates the different risk sources from different events and locations across a territory experiencing an overall degradation of the operational context conditions required for the safe functioning of nuclear and / radiological installations. The resulting conflict-situation related Emergency Planning Zones are not intended to replace the site-level existing zones, but rather to serve as an additional layer of defence built from an overall picture of the heightened latent risk affecting multiple nuclear installations. Aside from increasing the understanding of the risk distribution under the new challenging context conditions, the aggregated and quantitative nature of the new metrics provides a scientifically grounded basis criterion for decision-making regarding the allocation and extent of the protective provisions over the affected territory. This paper details the mathematical foundations of the new proposed risk-informed metrics. • Introduces a new framework to quantify latent radiological risk in conflict zones. • Defines risk-informed metrics integrating accident frequency and exposure likelihood. • Distinguishes sensitive vs latent risks for improved emergency preparedness. • Proposes conflict-specific EPZ distances based on aggregated territorial risk. • Establishes a top-down deterministic approach for bounding wartime scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114715
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated latent risk of radiological damage under conflict situation-part I: Concept and approach

M.A. Hernández-Ceballos, J.C. De la Rosa Blul, G. Magrotti, A. Guglielmelli et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
article

Integrated latent risk of radiological damage under conflict situation-part I: Concept and approach

M.A. Hernández-Ceballos, J.C. De la Rosa Blul, G. Magrotti, A. Guglielmelli, O. Parera Villacampa, C. Fazio
article en

Abstract

The set of protective arrangements implemented in response to uncontrolled radiological releases at nuclear installations greatly benefit from pre-existing provisions taken before the onset of the event during the so-called preparedness phase. Traditionally, emergency preparedness dispositions are implemented based on a single event occurrence at a specific location, i.e. event-oriented preparedness. However, such plans might prove inadequate in scenarios with an increase of accident risk affecting multiple nuclear installations. In these situations, the risk does not arise from an actual ongoing event at a specific installation, but rather from a degradation of the operational context conditions affecting wide areas of a territory hosting several nuclear facilities. In this case, there is no increase in sensitive risk due to an ongoing event but on the perceived, latent risk due a higher likelihood of accident arising from local conflicts or war scenario. Under such circumstances, event-oriented preparedness provisions might be insufficient to address the evolving of the new situation. This paper presents a methodology for the calculation of Emergency Planning Zone distances under conflict situation, based on the quantification of a novel risk figure of merit that integrates the different risk sources from different events and locations across a territory experiencing an overall degradation of the operational context conditions required for the safe functioning of nuclear and / radiological installations. The resulting conflict-situation related Emergency Planning Zones are not intended to replace the site-level existing zones, but rather to serve as an additional layer of defence built from an overall picture of the heightened latent risk affecting multiple nuclear installations. Aside from increasing the understanding of the risk distribution under the new challenging context conditions, the aggregated and quantitative nature of the new metrics provides a scientifically grounded basis criterion for decision-making regarding the allocation and extent of the protective provisions over the affected territory. This paper details the mathematical foundations of the new proposed risk-informed metrics. • Introduces a new framework to quantify latent radiological risk in conflict zones. • Defines risk-informed metrics integrating accident frequency and exposure likelihood. • Distinguishes sensitive vs latent risks for improved emergency preparedness. • Proposes conflict-specific EPZ distances based on aggregated territorial risk. • Establishes a top-down deterministic approach for bounding wartime scenarios.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 451
International Atomic Energy Agency (AT), Joint Research Centre (IT), Joint Research Centre (NL), University of Córdoba (ES), Cordoba University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.