How Realistic Was the Threat of “Hitler’s Atomic Bomb”?

Using factual information on background knowledge, costs, personnel numbers, resources, and facilities from the Manhattan Project, we examine the feasibility of the development of nuclear weapons in Germany in World War II. We conclude that, while for various reasons, a uranium bomb would have been technically and economically out of reach in Germany, a few plutonium bombs might have been possible had a coordinated aggressive project been initiated no later than about mid-1940. However, the German scientists involved never established an understanding of the functioning of an atomic bomb as contained in the Frisch–Peierls memorandum and were never asked to provide such a basis on which a decision on an atomic bomb program could be based. This means that a German atomic bomb program did not fail as is often assumed; rather, it was never started. The German uranium project was never more than a scientific mission to study the possibilities offered by the newly discovered source of nuclear power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Engineering
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jne7010019
Primary Topic
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Realistic Was the Threat of “Hitler’s Atomic Bomb”?

Manfred Popp, B. Cameron Reed, Piet de Klerk
Journal of Nuclear Engineering
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
article

How Realistic Was the Threat of “Hitler’s Atomic Bomb”?

Manfred Popp, B. Cameron Reed, Piet de Klerk
article en

Abstract

Using factual information on background knowledge, costs, personnel numbers, resources, and facilities from the Manhattan Project, we examine the feasibility of the development of nuclear weapons in Germany in World War II. We conclude that, while for various reasons, a uranium bomb would have been technically and economically out of reach in Germany, a few plutonium bombs might have been possible had a coordinated aggressive project been initiated no later than about mid-1940. However, the German scientists involved never established an understanding of the functioning of an atomic bomb as contained in the Frisch–Peierls memorandum and were never asked to provide such a basis on which a decision on an atomic bomb program could be based. This means that a German atomic bomb program did not fail as is often assumed; rather, it was never started. The German uranium project was never more than a scientific mission to study the possibilities offered by the newly discovered source of nuclear power.

Journal of Nuclear EngineeringVol. 7(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Saint Mary's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.