Innovation hubs and entrepreneurial support systems: a bibliometric and systematic literature review

Purpose This study examines how innovation hubs, including incubators, accelerators and regulatory sandboxes have been conceptualised and studied within the entrepreneurship and innovation literature. Although widely promoted as instruments of entrepreneurial support, this research remains fragmented, theoretically narrow and geographically concentrated. This study aims to clarify the intellectual foundations of the field and assess when and how innovation hubs contribute to entrepreneurial outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric and systematic literature review approach is used. Bibliometric mapping identifies intellectual structure, thematic clusters and citation patterns. The systematic component applies the antecedents–decisions–outcomes (ADO) and theory–context–method (TCM) frameworks to classify theoretical orientations, empirical settings and methodological approaches, enabling a multidimensional synthesis of the field. Findings Four core mechanisms, mentorship, network facilitation, infrastructure and financial access are frequently cited but vary in effectiveness depending on programme design and institutional context. Hubs with strategic adaptability, interpretive capacity and strong ecosystem embeddedness produce more durable outcomes. The literature remains dominated by resource-based perspectives and underutilises institutional and relational theories. Empirical work is concentrated in high-income contexts, limiting broader theoretical applicability. Originality/value The study’s primary contribution is to reconceptualise innovation hubs as contextually embedded and strategically adaptive organisations that interpret and mediate between institutional structures and entrepreneurial agency. By integrating the ADO and TCM frameworks within a combined bibliometric–systematic review, the study links antecedent conditions, strategic decision logics and entrepreneurial outcomes across macro-, meso- and micro-levels. This reconceptualisation advances a relational–institutional foundation for theorising innovation hubs within entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-07-2025-0233
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation hubs and entrepreneurial support systems: a bibliometric and systematic literature review

Wilberforce Owusu-Ansah, Joseph Amoah, Christian Agyapong Sarfo, Joseph Owusu
Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Innovation hubs and entrepreneurial support systems: a bibliometric and systematic literature review

Wilberforce Owusu-Ansah, Joseph Amoah, Christian Agyapong Sarfo, Joseph Owusu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how innovation hubs, including incubators, accelerators and regulatory sandboxes have been conceptualised and studied within the entrepreneurship and innovation literature. Although widely promoted as instruments of entrepreneurial support, this research remains fragmented, theoretically narrow and geographically concentrated. This study aims to clarify the intellectual foundations of the field and assess when and how innovation hubs contribute to entrepreneurial outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric and systematic literature review approach is used. Bibliometric mapping identifies intellectual structure, thematic clusters and citation patterns. The systematic component applies the antecedents–decisions–outcomes (ADO) and theory–context–method (TCM) frameworks to classify theoretical orientations, empirical settings and methodological approaches, enabling a multidimensional synthesis of the field. Findings Four core mechanisms, mentorship, network facilitation, infrastructure and financial access are frequently cited but vary in effectiveness depending on programme design and institutional context. Hubs with strategic adaptability, interpretive capacity and strong ecosystem embeddedness produce more durable outcomes. The literature remains dominated by resource-based perspectives and underutilises institutional and relational theories. Empirical work is concentrated in high-income contexts, limiting broader theoretical applicability. Originality/value The study’s primary contribution is to reconceptualise innovation hubs as contextually embedded and strategically adaptive organisations that interpret and mediate between institutional structures and entrepreneurial agency. By integrating the ADO and TCM frameworks within a combined bibliometric–systematic review, the study links antecedent conditions, strategic decision logics and entrepreneurial outcomes across macro-, meso- and micro-levels. This reconceptualisation advances a relational–institutional foundation for theorising innovation hubs within entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy
Lincoln University (NZ), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), University of Energy and Natural Resources (GH), Lincoln University - Pennsylvania (US), Kwame Nkrumah University (ZM), University of Lincoln (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.