Spontaneous production rates in music and speech: Effector systems or domain specificity?

Individuals perform many tasks at an optimal rate that is consistent within but not between individuals, evidenced by the spontaneous rate at which one performs a task in the absence of external rate cues. We tested three hypotheses concerning how spontaneous production rates (SPRs) are generated and associated across language and music tasks: Biomechanical constraints associated with effector systems (vocalized/fingered: H1), reliance on auditory feedback (presence/absence: H2), and domain-specific constraints (speech/music: H3). We tested these hypotheses by having participants produce music and speech sequences, sequences that used vocalized or fingered effectors, plus a Silent finger-tapping condition to test the influence of auditory feedback on spontaneous production rates. SPRs were significantly correlated across all tasks that involved production of auditory feedback, regardless of effector or domain. However, Silent Tapping rates were not significantly correlated with any SPRs that produced auditory feedback. Together, these findings suggest that the generation of auditory feedback plays a critical role in the spontaneous rate at which participants engage in rhythmic motor actions, more so than the biomechanical constraints of effector systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1744449
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spontaneous production rates in music and speech: Effector systems or domain specificity?

Caroline Palmėr, Nicole C. Coleman, Peter Q. Pfordrsher
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Spontaneous production rates in music and speech: Effector systems or domain specificity?

Caroline Palmėr, Nicole C. Coleman, Peter Q. Pfordrsher
article en

Abstract

Individuals perform many tasks at an optimal rate that is consistent within but not between individuals, evidenced by the spontaneous rate at which one performs a task in the absence of external rate cues. We tested three hypotheses concerning how spontaneous production rates (SPRs) are generated and associated across language and music tasks: Biomechanical constraints associated with effector systems (vocalized/fingered: H1), reliance on auditory feedback (presence/absence: H2), and domain-specific constraints (speech/music: H3). We tested these hypotheses by having participants produce music and speech sequences, sequences that used vocalized or fingered effectors, plus a Silent finger-tapping condition to test the influence of auditory feedback on spontaneous production rates. SPRs were significantly correlated across all tasks that involved production of auditory feedback, regardless of effector or domain. However, Silent Tapping rates were not significantly correlated with any SPRs that produced auditory feedback. Together, these findings suggest that the generation of auditory feedback plays a critical role in the spontaneous rate at which participants engage in rhythmic motor actions, more so than the biomechanical constraints of effector systems.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
McGill University (CA), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Science Foundation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.