COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Vulnerable Healthcare Workers: The Protective Role of Pre-Pandemic Recognition

<b>Background:</b> During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of the recognition of vulnerable workers was well-established, but the specific impact of the timing of their recognition remains less understood. <b>Objective</b>: This study evaluates the impact of early recognition of vulnerable healthcare workers (VHCWs) and identifies factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Virgen Macarena University Hospital (HUVM) in Seville and included employees classified as VHCWs between January 2020 and December 2021. All data, including demographic, occupational, and clinical data, were collected from occupational health records and the Andalusian digital health system. The incidence of COVID-19 was analyzed using descriptive, bivariate statistics, and Cox regression. <b>Results</b>: A total of 471 VHCWs were included. Most of the VHCWs were women (79.8%) with a median age of 50 years. The most common vulnerability criteria were pregnancy (32.9%) and age > 60 (28.7%). During the study period, 58 VHCWs (12.3%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, compared to 18.35% of the general workforce. Recognition of VHCW status after the pandemic was declared was strongly associated with higher infection risk (HR = 48.84; 95% CI: 26.21-90.99; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The timing of vulnerability recognition emerged as the most critical protective factor in this cohort. Healthcare workers whose vulnerability was not proactively identified before the pandemic onset faced a substantially higher risk of infection (HR = 44.68; 95% CI: 26.21-90.99; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to those recognized early. These findings underscore that pre-pandemic identification facilitated the immediate implementation of task adaptations and workplace restrictions, effectively mitigating high-risk exposure during the most critical early stages of the crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinics and Practice
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract16030048
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Vulnerable Healthcare Workers: The Protective Role of Pre-Pandemic Recognition

Emilio García-Cabrera, Julia Romero-Barranca, Ángel Vilches-Arenas, Manuel Delgado-Calderón et al.
Clinics and Practice
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Vulnerable Healthcare Workers: The Protective Role of Pre-Pandemic Recognition

Emilio García-Cabrera, Julia Romero-Barranca, Ángel Vilches-Arenas, Manuel Delgado-Calderón, Lara Estefanía Jiménez-Ortega, María Ladisa, Juan Luís Cabanilla-Moruno
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of the recognition of vulnerable workers was well-established, but the specific impact of the timing of their recognition remains less understood. <b>Objective</b>: This study evaluates the impact of early recognition of vulnerable healthcare workers (VHCWs) and identifies factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Virgen Macarena University Hospital (HUVM) in Seville and included employees classified as VHCWs between January 2020 and December 2021. All data, including demographic, occupational, and clinical data, were collected from occupational health records and the Andalusian digital health system. The incidence of COVID-19 was analyzed using descriptive, bivariate statistics, and Cox regression. <b>Results</b>: A total of 471 VHCWs were included. Most of the VHCWs were women (79.8%) with a median age of 50 years. The most common vulnerability criteria were pregnancy (32.9%) and age > 60 (28.7%). During the study period, 58 VHCWs (12.3%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, compared to 18.35% of the general workforce. Recognition of VHCW status after the pandemic was declared was strongly associated with higher infection risk (HR = 48.84; 95% CI: 26.21-90.99; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The timing of vulnerability recognition emerged as the most critical protective factor in this cohort. Healthcare workers whose vulnerability was not proactively identified before the pandemic onset faced a substantially higher risk of infection (HR = 44.68; 95% CI: 26.21-90.99; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to those recognized early. These findings underscore that pre-pandemic identification facilitated the immediate implementation of task adaptations and workplace restrictions, effectively mitigating high-risk exposure during the most critical early stages of the crisis.

Clinics and PracticeVol. 16(3)
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.