Towards operational net-zero pathways in industrial wastewater treatment systems using digital decision support tools

Effective green transition strategies require reliable quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the ability to evaluate alternative operational regimes. In this study, a digital decision support tool (DST) is constructed to assess and meet net-zero targets in water treatment systems (WTS). A set of mathematical models was developed and integrated to replicate the behavior of the largest industrial WTS in Northern Europe, focusing on effluent quality and operational costs. In parallel, a GHG emissions module was constructed to estimate direct emissions (DE, Scope 1), indirect energy-related emissions (ERE, Scope 2), selected / operation-linked upstream and downstream emissions (UDE, derived from a screened subset of Scope 3), and avoided emissions (AE, often referred to as Scope 4). Additional biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (BioE) were quantified within both DE and UDE categories. Four mitigation scenarios were analyzed: (i) carbon refluxing (S1), (ii) carbon recovery and alternative inactivation strategies (S2 and S3), (iii) nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) mitigation (S4 and S5), and (iv) biogas upgrading and direct grid injection (S6 and S7). Simulations demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately reproduces COD, N, P, and S mass balances (9.3% deviation), long term and high frequency dynamic performance profiles (11.3% deviation, NRMSE < 0.16), plant-wide energy consumption and production (5.0% and 3.8% deviations respectively), and operational expenditures (OPEX) (4.3% and 3.9% deviations for revenues and costs). GHG accounting results indicate that DE accounts for 39%, ERE for 9%, and UDE for 52% of total operational emissions corresponding to approximately 5.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup>. N<sub>2</sub>O is the dominant contributor to DE (88%), while UDE is primarily driven by downstream sludge treatment (74%). AE from fertilizer and downstream natural-gas substitution fully counterbalanced total GHG releases, resulting in an operational net-zero performance of -0.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> within the defined system boundaries. When BioE is accounted, DE is increased by a factor of 3. S1, S6 and S7 achieve operational net-negative performance up to -2.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> by the raised AE from increased substitution of grid energy and mineral fertilizers. S2, S3, S4 and S5 fail to achieve the same net-zero targets due to a significant rise in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions driven by altered COD/N ratios and/or excessive energy (heat) and chemical (NaOH) demands. By integrating comprehensive modelling and GHG accounting, the DST supports evidence-based decision-making for industrial stakeholders seeking to optimize resource use, minimize operation-linked emissions, and guide long-term investments in sustainable wastewater infrastructure. Based on the presented results this tool is now used by the company to handle future optimizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125639
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards operational net-zero pathways in industrial wastewater treatment systems using digital decision support tools

Krist V. Gernaey, Cai Siying, Flores-Alsina Xavier, Sille Bendix Larsen et al.
Water Research
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Towards operational net-zero pathways in industrial wastewater treatment systems using digital decision support tools

Krist V. Gernaey, Cai Siying, Flores-Alsina Xavier, Sille Bendix Larsen, Kjellberg Kasper, Whale-Obrero Jaime, Lei Tianyu
article en

Abstract

Effective green transition strategies require reliable quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the ability to evaluate alternative operational regimes. In this study, a digital decision support tool (DST) is constructed to assess and meet net-zero targets in water treatment systems (WTS). A set of mathematical models was developed and integrated to replicate the behavior of the largest industrial WTS in Northern Europe, focusing on effluent quality and operational costs. In parallel, a GHG emissions module was constructed to estimate direct emissions (DE, Scope 1), indirect energy-related emissions (ERE, Scope 2), selected / operation-linked upstream and downstream emissions (UDE, derived from a screened subset of Scope 3), and avoided emissions (AE, often referred to as Scope 4). Additional biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (BioE) were quantified within both DE and UDE categories. Four mitigation scenarios were analyzed: (i) carbon refluxing (S1), (ii) carbon recovery and alternative inactivation strategies (S2 and S3), (iii) nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) mitigation (S4 and S5), and (iv) biogas upgrading and direct grid injection (S6 and S7). Simulations demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately reproduces COD, N, P, and S mass balances (9.3% deviation), long term and high frequency dynamic performance profiles (11.3% deviation, NRMSE < 0.16), plant-wide energy consumption and production (5.0% and 3.8% deviations respectively), and operational expenditures (OPEX) (4.3% and 3.9% deviations for revenues and costs). GHG accounting results indicate that DE accounts for 39%, ERE for 9%, and UDE for 52% of total operational emissions corresponding to approximately 5.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup>. N<sub>2</sub>O is the dominant contributor to DE (88%), while UDE is primarily driven by downstream sludge treatment (74%). AE from fertilizer and downstream natural-gas substitution fully counterbalanced total GHG releases, resulting in an operational net-zero performance of -0.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> within the defined system boundaries. When BioE is accounted, DE is increased by a factor of 3. S1, S6 and S7 achieve operational net-negative performance up to -2.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> by the raised AE from increased substitution of grid energy and mineral fertilizers. S2, S3, S4 and S5 fail to achieve the same net-zero targets due to a significant rise in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions driven by altered COD/N ratios and/or excessive energy (heat) and chemical (NaOH) demands. By integrating comprehensive modelling and GHG accounting, the DST supports evidence-based decision-making for industrial stakeholders seeking to optimize resource use, minimize operation-linked emissions, and guide long-term investments in sustainable wastewater infrastructure. Based on the presented results this tool is now used by the company to handle future optimizations.

Water ResearchVol. 296
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.