Development and pilot testing of the AMPS model for predicting ICU mortality in low and middle income countries

Mortality prediction models developed in high-income country intensive care units (ICUs) may perform poorly in low–middle-income country (LMIC) ICUs due to differences in case mix and provision of life-supporting interventions. This study aims to develop a novel prognostic score and investigate its precision, discrimination, and calibration properties in predicting ICU mortality. Predictor variables were identified by reviewing relevant published studies from LMICs. The most frequently cited variables were selected to develop A Mortality Predictor Score (AMPS). Subsequently, the tool was assessed for accuracy, discrimination, and calibration using the Brier score, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), reliability diagram and Decision curve analysis by using data gathered from the ICU of Black Lion Hospital between September 2019 and September 2020. Its prognostic ability was compared with the mortality prediction model II (MPM II) and ICU priority level. P p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. The commonly identified model variables were Altered Mental status, Mechanical ventilation, More than two organ systems diagnosis, Pressure (systolic) less than 90, Potentially irreversible condition, Suspected infection, and Severe hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <2 g/dl) (A(MPS)2. Each of these variables was found to be predictors of mortality when tested on 265 ICU patients admitted to the Adult Intensive Care Unit of Black Lion Hospital. A(MPS)2 was able to correctly predict mortality in 86.4% of the cases with a sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 84.6%. The area under the curve for the predictor scores was AMPS (Area 0.92; CI 0.88–0.93), MPM II score (Area 0.86; CI 0.82–0.91), and ICU priority level (Area 0.76; CI 0.68–0.83). AMPS is a promising prognostic score for ICU mortality in low-resource settings. External validation and comparison to other scores are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41056-7
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and pilot testing of the AMPS model for predicting ICU mortality in low and middle income countries

Abate Yeshidinber Weldetsadik, Adam D. Laytin, Emnet Tesfaye Shimber, Woldesenbet Waganew et al.
Scientific Reports
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Development and pilot testing of the AMPS model for predicting ICU mortality in low and middle income countries

Abate Yeshidinber Weldetsadik, Adam D. Laytin, Emnet Tesfaye Shimber, Woldesenbet Waganew, Merahi Kefyalew Merahi, Ayalew Zewdie, Lemlem Beza, Menbeu Sultan, Finot Debebe, Neill Adhikari, Alberto Goffi, Yared Firissa
article en

Abstract

Mortality prediction models developed in high-income country intensive care units (ICUs) may perform poorly in low–middle-income country (LMIC) ICUs due to differences in case mix and provision of life-supporting interventions. This study aims to develop a novel prognostic score and investigate its precision, discrimination, and calibration properties in predicting ICU mortality. Predictor variables were identified by reviewing relevant published studies from LMICs. The most frequently cited variables were selected to develop A Mortality Predictor Score (AMPS). Subsequently, the tool was assessed for accuracy, discrimination, and calibration using the Brier score, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), reliability diagram and Decision curve analysis by using data gathered from the ICU of Black Lion Hospital between September 2019 and September 2020. Its prognostic ability was compared with the mortality prediction model II (MPM II) and ICU priority level. P p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. The commonly identified model variables were Altered Mental status, Mechanical ventilation, More than two organ systems diagnosis, Pressure (systolic) less than 90, Potentially irreversible condition, Suspected infection, and Severe hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <2 g/dl) (A(MPS)2. Each of these variables was found to be predictors of mortality when tested on 265 ICU patients admitted to the Adult Intensive Care Unit of Black Lion Hospital. A(MPS)2 was able to correctly predict mortality in 86.4% of the cases with a sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 84.6%. The area under the curve for the predictor scores was AMPS (Area 0.92; CI 0.88–0.93), MPM II score (Area 0.86; CI 0.82–0.91), and ICU priority level (Area 0.76; CI 0.68–0.83). AMPS is a promising prognostic score for ICU mortality in low-resource settings. External validation and comparison to other scores are needed.

Scientific Reports
Johns Hopkins University (US), New York Medical College (US), University of Toronto (CA), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), All Africa Leprosy Tuberculosis and Rehabilitation Training Centre (ET), Adventist University of Central Africa (RW), University of Kigali (RW), Carnegie Mellon University Africa (RW), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW), St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Addis Ababa University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.