Clinical Competencies for the Burn Speech-Language Pathologist: A Multidisciplinary Development and Delphi Consensus Study

Clinical competency guidelines promote optimal, safe standard-of-care. While nationally established clinical competencies exist for burn occupational therapists and physiotherapists, no equivalent frameworks exist for burn speech-language-pathologists (SLPs). To address this gap, we developed a burn-specific SLP competency tool. Led by the American Burn Association (ABA) Rehabilitation Committee, an expert panel of burn SLPs, Burn Therapists-Certified (BT-C) clinicians, and a physiatrist implemented a staged process. Current national and international practice guidelines were synthesized through modified Delphi methodology, with expert consensus meetings to create and refine a burn SLP competency tool. The ABA Burn Rehabilitation Therapists Competency Tool served as the model framework. Eighteen multidisciplinary burn clinicians representing 14 burn centers, across three countries, refined the burn SLP competency tool. A steering group (five SLPs, one burn physiatrist) identified 103 competency statements spanning 15 core clinical domains. These were presented across two rounds of Delphi survey and consensus meetings. The tool was refined with each survey resulting in a final tool comprising 81 knowledge and application competency statements covering 17 domains, tailored to the burn SLP across the continuum-of-care for adult and pediatric populations. The tool is structured into two tiered levels of expertise; Level-1: minimum level of specialist skill required to manage a burn patient, Level-2: expert level of specialist skill and recognized resource to other SLPs. This initiative has produced the first internationally developed and consensus-based competency tool for burn SLPs. It establishes a standardized reference for SLPs to deliver specialized burn care throughout the acute and rehabilitative continuum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag028
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Competencies for the Burn Speech-Language Pathologist: A Multidisciplinary Development and Delphi Consensus Study

Michelle N Dwertman, A. Yu. Ratner, Matthew Godleski, Emily L. Silverberg et al.
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Clinical Competencies for the Burn Speech-Language Pathologist: A Multidisciplinary Development and Delphi Consensus Study

Michelle N Dwertman, A. Yu. Ratner, Matthew Godleski, Emily L. Silverberg, H Regal, Tiffany Mohr, Kathleen Webler, Lori Ann Arguello, Ingrid Parry, Lisa K. Forbes, Nicola Clayton, Bernedette Nedelec, Heather Cappel, Kathleen Kerr, Nabil M. Jabbour, Yekaterina Shemyakin, Danielle Busch, Dani Carisse
article en

Abstract

Clinical competency guidelines promote optimal, safe standard-of-care. While nationally established clinical competencies exist for burn occupational therapists and physiotherapists, no equivalent frameworks exist for burn speech-language-pathologists (SLPs). To address this gap, we developed a burn-specific SLP competency tool. Led by the American Burn Association (ABA) Rehabilitation Committee, an expert panel of burn SLPs, Burn Therapists-Certified (BT-C) clinicians, and a physiatrist implemented a staged process. Current national and international practice guidelines were synthesized through modified Delphi methodology, with expert consensus meetings to create and refine a burn SLP competency tool. The ABA Burn Rehabilitation Therapists Competency Tool served as the model framework. Eighteen multidisciplinary burn clinicians representing 14 burn centers, across three countries, refined the burn SLP competency tool. A steering group (five SLPs, one burn physiatrist) identified 103 competency statements spanning 15 core clinical domains. These were presented across two rounds of Delphi survey and consensus meetings. The tool was refined with each survey resulting in a final tool comprising 81 knowledge and application competency statements covering 17 domains, tailored to the burn SLP across the continuum-of-care for adult and pediatric populations. The tool is structured into two tiered levels of expertise; Level-1: minimum level of specialist skill required to manage a burn patient, Level-2: expert level of specialist skill and recognized resource to other SLPs. This initiative has produced the first internationally developed and consensus-based competency tool for burn SLPs. It establishes a standardized reference for SLPs to deliver specialized burn care throughout the acute and rehabilitative continuum.

Journal of Burn Care & Research
Saint Barnabas Medical Center (US), The University of Sydney (AU), Queensland Health (AU), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of Utah (US), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Orlando Regional Medical Center (US), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU), Shriners Hospitals for Children - Northern California (US), Utah Department of Health (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), McGill University (CA), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.