Reference values for gait speed, five-times-sit-to-stand test, balance, and handgrip strength: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Simple performance-based tests such as gait speed, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), balance tests, and handgrip strength are associated with health outcomes. We aimed to establish age- and sex-specific reference (normative) values for these tests in the English population. Adults aged ≥ 50 years (female n = 4,234; male n = 3,424) from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were included. Weighted percentiles ranging from the 5th to the 95th percentile [P5-95] were calculated. Best gait speed performance was found among 60-64-year-olds (female P5-95: 0.54-1.46 m/s; male P5-95: 0.60-1.56 m/s) and the worst among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 0.23-0.98 m/s; male P5-95: 0.26-1.05 m/s). Best FTSST performance was found among 50-54- and 55-59-year-olds (female P5-95: 15.6-5.6 s; male P5-95: 14.1-5.5 s) and the worst among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 26.3-9.8 s; male P5-95: 23.4-8.6 s). Balance tests showed variable age patterns; however, performance in single-leg balance with eyes closed was best among the youngest available age group and worst among the oldest available age group. The highest handgrip strength (standing position) was found among 50-54- and 55-59-year-olds (female P5-95: 15-38 kg; male P5-95: 32-58 kg) and lowest among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 9-24 kg; male P5-95: 19-38 kg), with a similar pattern for the sitting testing position. These values can serve as a benchmark for clinical assessment, guide interventions, and support future research on physical function and healthy ageing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeroScience
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-026-02163-5
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference values for gait speed, five-times-sit-to-stand test, balance, and handgrip strength: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Pedro L. Valenzuela, Vanessa Kristina Wazny, Ben Kirk, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon et al.
GeroScience
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Reference values for gait speed, five-times-sit-to-stand test, balance, and handgrip strength: analysis of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Pedro L. Valenzuela, Vanessa Kristina Wazny, Ben Kirk, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Jozo Grgic
article en

Abstract

Simple performance-based tests such as gait speed, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), balance tests, and handgrip strength are associated with health outcomes. We aimed to establish age- and sex-specific reference (normative) values for these tests in the English population. Adults aged ≥ 50 years (female n = 4,234; male n = 3,424) from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were included. Weighted percentiles ranging from the 5th to the 95th percentile [P5-95] were calculated. Best gait speed performance was found among 60-64-year-olds (female P5-95: 0.54-1.46 m/s; male P5-95: 0.60-1.56 m/s) and the worst among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 0.23-0.98 m/s; male P5-95: 0.26-1.05 m/s). Best FTSST performance was found among 50-54- and 55-59-year-olds (female P5-95: 15.6-5.6 s; male P5-95: 14.1-5.5 s) and the worst among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 26.3-9.8 s; male P5-95: 23.4-8.6 s). Balance tests showed variable age patterns; however, performance in single-leg balance with eyes closed was best among the youngest available age group and worst among the oldest available age group. The highest handgrip strength (standing position) was found among 50-54- and 55-59-year-olds (female P5-95: 15-38 kg; male P5-95: 32-58 kg) and lowest among ≥ 85-year-olds (female P5-95: 9-24 kg; male P5-95: 19-38 kg), with a similar pattern for the sitting testing position. These values can serve as a benchmark for clinical assessment, guide interventions, and support future research on physical function and healthy ageing.

GeroScience
The University of Melbourne (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Western Health (AU), Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AU), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.