Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia

Corruption continues to be a significant governance concern in Southeast Asia, eroding economic development, political legitimacy, and social equality. Countries including Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore exhibit varied institutional strategies for anti-corruption governance, encompassing both highly centralized enforcement methods and hybrid democratic accountability frameworks. This doctoral-level policy research paper analyzes institutional design, public procurement reform, digital transparency instruments, and financial accountability frameworks throughout the area. It synthesizes comparative political economy, institutional theory, and public administration paradigms to delineate reform trajectories suited to growing democracies and hybrid regimes. The report finishes with a policy framework highlighting legal change, technological integration, citizen monitoring, and regional collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18793414
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Anti-Corruption & Transparency in Southeast Asia

Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
article en

Abstract

Corruption continues to be a significant governance concern in Southeast Asia, eroding economic development, political legitimacy, and social equality. Countries including Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore exhibit varied institutional strategies for anti-corruption governance, encompassing both highly centralized enforcement methods and hybrid democratic accountability frameworks. This doctoral-level policy research paper analyzes institutional design, public procurement reform, digital transparency instruments, and financial accountability frameworks throughout the area. It synthesizes comparative political economy, institutional theory, and public administration paradigms to delineate reform trajectories suited to growing democracies and hybrid regimes. The report finishes with a policy framework highlighting legal change, technological integration, citizen monitoring, and regional collaboration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
People's University of Bangladesh (BD), Legal Aid New South Wales (AU), Essence Line (Czechia) (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.