Stature Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Addressing the Current Status, Challenges and Future Prospects

Background: Stature estimation is a key parameter in biological profiling of human skeletal remains and thus in aiding in the identification process of the deceased. Various methods, including anatomical approaches, multifactorial regressions and organic correlation approaches, have been developed to estimate stature. Challenges arise from incomplete or altered remains, outdated reference samples, and the lack of population specific studies. This paper critically examines genetic influences and population-specific factors, the present status quo, recent developments and the challenges in stature estimation in forensic anthropology. Methods: The study appraises the current status, challenges, and future directions of stature estimation in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. The open-source literature is systematically identified, and relevant osteological and imaging-based studies are screened and prioritised when they report original empirical data or clearly defined methodological developments, enabling consistent extraction of sample and population descriptors, modelling strategies, and limitations. Included studies are then synthesised comparatively and summarised in a study table to support direct cross-study evaluation. Results: Stature estimation accuracy is shown to depend on population, ancestry, sex, time period, and environment, with cross-population or cross-temporal equation transfer identified as a key source of bias. Limitations include fragmented/altered remains and non-representative reference samples, while newer imaging and probabilistic approaches improve performance when supported by suitable data and explicit error quantification. Conclusions: In the present article, stature estimation is positioned as a context-dependent, evidence-weighted process rather than a fixed calculation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci6010023
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stature Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Addressing the Current Status, Challenges and Future Prospects

Peter Zioupos, Nicholas Marquez-Grant, Tooba Siddiqui
Forensic Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Stature Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Addressing the Current Status, Challenges and Future Prospects

Peter Zioupos, Nicholas Marquez-Grant, Tooba Siddiqui
article en

Abstract

Background: Stature estimation is a key parameter in biological profiling of human skeletal remains and thus in aiding in the identification process of the deceased. Various methods, including anatomical approaches, multifactorial regressions and organic correlation approaches, have been developed to estimate stature. Challenges arise from incomplete or altered remains, outdated reference samples, and the lack of population specific studies. This paper critically examines genetic influences and population-specific factors, the present status quo, recent developments and the challenges in stature estimation in forensic anthropology. Methods: The study appraises the current status, challenges, and future directions of stature estimation in forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology. The open-source literature is systematically identified, and relevant osteological and imaging-based studies are screened and prioritised when they report original empirical data or clearly defined methodological developments, enabling consistent extraction of sample and population descriptors, modelling strategies, and limitations. Included studies are then synthesised comparatively and summarised in a study table to support direct cross-study evaluation. Results: Stature estimation accuracy is shown to depend on population, ancestry, sex, time period, and environment, with cross-population or cross-temporal equation transfer identified as a key source of bias. Limitations include fragmented/altered remains and non-representative reference samples, while newer imaging and probabilistic approaches improve performance when supported by suitable data and explicit error quantification. Conclusions: In the present article, stature estimation is positioned as a context-dependent, evidence-weighted process rather than a fixed calculation.

Forensic SciencesVol. 6(1)
University of Hull (GB), Capital Group (United States) (US), Cranfield University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.