Cosmetic procedure attitudes scale (CPAS): Development and validation

The pursuit of cosmetic procedures has become increasingly normalized, particularly among women and younger consumers, yet existing measures of cosmetic procedure attitudes remain limited. This research developed and validated two new scales assessing attitudes toward surgical and non-surgical procedures. In Study 1, an initial item pool was generated through focus groups and expert consultations. In Study 2, 373 women (M = 22.81, SD = 5.46) completed an online questionnaire assessing attitudes toward surgical (S) and non-surgical (NS) procedures. Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure; intrapersonal, interpersonal, and consideration, for both the 20-item surgical (CPAS-S) and 19-item non-surgical (CPAS-NS) scales. In Study 3, a new sample of 350 women (M = 21.86, SD = 4.72) completed the refined CPAS items and related psychological constructs. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the refined 16-item versions of both scales (CPAS-S and CPAS-NS). The scales demonstrated convergent, divergent, and incremental validity and showed strong test-retest reliability and agreement (N = 75, M = 21.39, SD = 4.23). For all three studies, most participants were recruited in Australia, with some recruited internationally via Prolific. Collectively, these studies provide support for contemporary, psychometrically robust tools for assessing attitudes toward surgical and non-surgical cosmetic procedures and their links with appearance-related concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Body Image
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2026.102051
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmetic procedure attitudes scale (CPAS): Development and validation

Grace F. Barker, Veya Seekis, Caroline L. Donovan
Body Image
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
article

Cosmetic procedure attitudes scale (CPAS): Development and validation

Grace F. Barker, Veya Seekis, Caroline L. Donovan
article en

Abstract

The pursuit of cosmetic procedures has become increasingly normalized, particularly among women and younger consumers, yet existing measures of cosmetic procedure attitudes remain limited. This research developed and validated two new scales assessing attitudes toward surgical and non-surgical procedures. In Study 1, an initial item pool was generated through focus groups and expert consultations. In Study 2, 373 women (M = 22.81, SD = 5.46) completed an online questionnaire assessing attitudes toward surgical (S) and non-surgical (NS) procedures. Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure; intrapersonal, interpersonal, and consideration, for both the 20-item surgical (CPAS-S) and 19-item non-surgical (CPAS-NS) scales. In Study 3, a new sample of 350 women (M = 21.86, SD = 4.72) completed the refined CPAS items and related psychological constructs. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the refined 16-item versions of both scales (CPAS-S and CPAS-NS). The scales demonstrated convergent, divergent, and incremental validity and showed strong test-retest reliability and agreement (N = 75, M = 21.39, SD = 4.23). For all three studies, most participants were recruited in Australia, with some recruited internationally via Prolific. Collectively, these studies provide support for contemporary, psychometrically robust tools for assessing attitudes toward surgical and non-surgical cosmetic procedures and their links with appearance-related concerns.

Body ImageVol. 57
Griffith University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.