Breaking the ceiling: Interest rate deregulation and liquidity creation

This paper exploits the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, which eliminated Arkansas’s longstanding interest rate cap for Arkansas-headquartered banks, to identify how releasing a strict pricing constraint alters bank liquidity creation. We find clear differences across bank size: large banks increase liquidity creation after deregulation, while small banks reduce it, a pattern consistent with established differences in how banks of different sizes adjust to regulatory constraints. The composition of liquidity creation also changes, with large banks shifting toward commercial, industrial, and mortgage lending and small banks increasing individual loans. Competitive pressures intensify once the ceiling is lifted, contributing to the divergent responses among banks. We further show that the ceiling muted the responsiveness of liquidity creation to monetary policy and that this friction disappears following deregulation. Overall, the findings advance the literature by connecting interest rate (de)regulation to core banking functions and the effectiveness of monetary policy, with broader implications for regulated credit markets across countries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2026.102310
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking the ceiling: Interest rate deregulation and liquidity creation

Sara Wang, Jonathan Lee
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Breaking the ceiling: Interest rate deregulation and liquidity creation

Sara Wang, Jonathan Lee
article en

Abstract

This paper exploits the 1999 Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, which eliminated Arkansas’s longstanding interest rate cap for Arkansas-headquartered banks, to identify how releasing a strict pricing constraint alters bank liquidity creation. We find clear differences across bank size: large banks increase liquidity creation after deregulation, while small banks reduce it, a pattern consistent with established differences in how banks of different sizes adjust to regulatory constraints. The composition of liquidity creation also changes, with large banks shifting toward commercial, industrial, and mortgage lending and small banks increasing individual loans. Competitive pressures intensify once the ceiling is lifted, contributing to the divergent responses among banks. We further show that the ceiling muted the responsiveness of liquidity creation to monetary policy and that this friction disappears following deregulation. Overall, the findings advance the literature by connecting interest rate (de)regulation to core banking functions and the effectiveness of monetary policy, with broader implications for regulated credit markets across countries.

Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and MoneyVol. 108
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.