Product personality profiling in food research: A critical review of applications, methodological designs, and interpretative scope

Product Personality Profiling (PPP) is a projective consumer research method in which participants imagine a product as a person and describe it using human characteristics such as age, gender, lifestyle, diet, and personality traits. PPP enables access to symbolic and identity-related meanings that are difficult to capture through direct questioning. However, its application in food science is recent and remains poorly systematized. This review critically examines the application of PPP in food research, focusing on experimental design, response formats, category construction, and data analysis strategies. A structured search in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was performed, and four empirical food studies were included in a critical-interpretative synthesis following screening. The integration with complementary methods, such as the Food Choice Questionnaire, Word Association, and Shopping List tasks, is evaluated to strengthen interpretative robustness and avoid conflating symbolic projection with declared behavior. PPP consistently differentiates products based on perceived target consumers, health orientation, ethical positioning, and lifestyle stereotypes, even when sensory differences are minimal. PPP is particularly sensitive to label cues and ingredient-related information, underscoring its relevance for clean-label and reformulation contexts. Nevertheless, existing applications exhibit substantial methodological heterogeneity, including inconsistent subcategory definitions and limited justification of sample size. PPP should be considered a complementary interpretative method rather than a substitute for classical sensory approaches. This review proposes operational reporting and validation benchmarks to support methodological consolidation and highlights PPP's relevance for identity-driven segmentation and clean-label innovation. • First critical synthesis of Product Personality Profiling (PPP) applications in food research. • PPP differentiates foods by target consumers, health, ethics, and lifestyle cues. • PPP is sensitive to label cues and ingredient-related information. • Stimuli type, response formats, and analytical strategies are key factors. • Guidelines are proposed to support the consolidation of PPP in food consumer research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2026.105659
Primary Topic
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Product personality profiling in food research: A critical review of applications, methodological designs, and interpretative scope

Géssica Cristina da Veiga, Erick A. Esmerino, Tatiana Colombo Pimentel, Adriano Gomes Cruz
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
article

Product personality profiling in food research: A critical review of applications, methodological designs, and interpretative scope

Géssica Cristina da Veiga, Erick A. Esmerino, Tatiana Colombo Pimentel, Adriano Gomes Cruz
article en

Abstract

Product Personality Profiling (PPP) is a projective consumer research method in which participants imagine a product as a person and describe it using human characteristics such as age, gender, lifestyle, diet, and personality traits. PPP enables access to symbolic and identity-related meanings that are difficult to capture through direct questioning. However, its application in food science is recent and remains poorly systematized. This review critically examines the application of PPP in food research, focusing on experimental design, response formats, category construction, and data analysis strategies. A structured search in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was performed, and four empirical food studies were included in a critical-interpretative synthesis following screening. The integration with complementary methods, such as the Food Choice Questionnaire, Word Association, and Shopping List tasks, is evaluated to strengthen interpretative robustness and avoid conflating symbolic projection with declared behavior. PPP consistently differentiates products based on perceived target consumers, health orientation, ethical positioning, and lifestyle stereotypes, even when sensory differences are minimal. PPP is particularly sensitive to label cues and ingredient-related information, underscoring its relevance for clean-label and reformulation contexts. Nevertheless, existing applications exhibit substantial methodological heterogeneity, including inconsistent subcategory definitions and limited justification of sample size. PPP should be considered a complementary interpretative method rather than a substitute for classical sensory approaches. This review proposes operational reporting and validation benchmarks to support methodological consolidation and highlights PPP's relevance for identity-driven segmentation and clean-label innovation. • First critical synthesis of Product Personality Profiling (PPP) applications in food research. • PPP differentiates foods by target consumers, health, ethics, and lifestyle cues. • PPP is sensitive to label cues and ingredient-related information. • Stimuli type, response formats, and analytical strategies are key factors. • Guidelines are proposed to support the consolidation of PPP in food consumer research.

Trends in Food Science & TechnologyVol. 171
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Instituto Federal do Paraná (BR), Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.