Differences in professional and interprofessional identity across years of professional education: a cross-sectional study of Norwegian health- and social care students

There has been a call for studies investigating the assumption that professional and interprofessional identities evolve differently during educational programmes. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of professional and interprofessional identity across different years of health and social care students’ professional education. This cross-sectional study invited students across all study years from eleven health and social care higher education programmes at one university to complete a web-based questionnaire. Professional and interprofessional identity were assessed using the Macleod Clark Professional Identity Scale (MCPIS-9). Differences in identity scores between study years were examined using two-sample t-tests and multivariable regression models. In total, 864 students, approximately one-fifth of the study population, participated. Across all study years, mean (SD) scores were 4.15 (0.54) for professional identity and 4.17 (0.53) for interprofessional identity (scale range 1–5). Final-year students scored slightly higher than first-year students on professional identity (mean difference 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.30), with a smaller difference observed for interprofessional identity (0.10, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.21). The difference between first- and final-year students was 0.08 points larger for professional than for interprofessional identity. When stratified by programme length, the mean difference in professional identity between the first and final study year was 0.17 (p = 0.034) in three-year bachelor programmes and 0.30 (p = 0.022) in six-year professional programmes. Corresponding differences for interprofessional identity were smaller: 0.08 (p = 0.386) for bachelor programmes and 0.24 (p = 0.049) for six-year programmes. Students in later study years exhibited slightly higher professional identity scores than earlier years, with smaller between-year differences for interprofessional identity. The very small between-year differences may reflect lack of measurement sensitivity in MCPIS-9, stability in identity levels, high professional identity during the first year of study, or cohort effects inherent to cross-sectional designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08893-6
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in professional and interprofessional identity across years of professional education: a cross-sectional study of Norwegian health- and social care students

Ragna Stalsberg, Hilde Grimstad, Aslak Steinsbekk, Albertina Rusandu et al.
BMC Medical Education
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Differences in professional and interprofessional identity across years of professional education: a cross-sectional study of Norwegian health- and social care students

Ragna Stalsberg, Hilde Grimstad, Aslak Steinsbekk, Albertina Rusandu, Randi Juul, Cathinka Thyness, Beate André
article en

Abstract

There has been a call for studies investigating the assumption that professional and interprofessional identities evolve differently during educational programmes. The aim of this study was to investigate the level of professional and interprofessional identity across different years of health and social care students’ professional education. This cross-sectional study invited students across all study years from eleven health and social care higher education programmes at one university to complete a web-based questionnaire. Professional and interprofessional identity were assessed using the Macleod Clark Professional Identity Scale (MCPIS-9). Differences in identity scores between study years were examined using two-sample t-tests and multivariable regression models. In total, 864 students, approximately one-fifth of the study population, participated. Across all study years, mean (SD) scores were 4.15 (0.54) for professional identity and 4.17 (0.53) for interprofessional identity (scale range 1–5). Final-year students scored slightly higher than first-year students on professional identity (mean difference 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.30), with a smaller difference observed for interprofessional identity (0.10, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.21). The difference between first- and final-year students was 0.08 points larger for professional than for interprofessional identity. When stratified by programme length, the mean difference in professional identity between the first and final study year was 0.17 (p = 0.034) in three-year bachelor programmes and 0.30 (p = 0.022) in six-year professional programmes. Corresponding differences for interprofessional identity were smaller: 0.08 (p = 0.386) for bachelor programmes and 0.24 (p = 0.049) for six-year programmes. Students in later study years exhibited slightly higher professional identity scores than earlier years, with smaller between-year differences for interprofessional identity. The very small between-year differences may reflect lack of measurement sensitivity in MCPIS-9, stability in identity levels, high professional identity during the first year of study, or cohort effects inherent to cross-sectional designs.

BMC Medical Education
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Trondheim Kommune (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.