Cardiac Surgery in Cancer Patients: Clinical Dilemmas and Decision-Making Challenges

<b>Background:</b> Improvements in cancer detection and treatment have led to a growing population of cancer survivors who subsequently develop cardiovascular (CV) disease requiring cardiac surgery. <b>Methods:</b> This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence from observational studies, registries, meta-analyses, and international guidelines addressing cardiac surgery in patients with active or prior cancer. <b>Results:</b> Cancer patients undergoing cardiac surgery face heightened risks related to hypercoagulability, bleeding, immunosuppression, frailty, and prior exposure to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Conventional surgical risk scores inadequately capture cancer-specific factors such as tumor biology, prognosis, treatment trajectory, and frailty, often underestimating operative risk. Timing of surgery must balance CV urgency against oncologic priorities, with urgent cardiac conditions necessitating prompt intervention irrespective of cancer status, while stable disease allows individualized sequencing. Transcatheter and minimally invasive approaches increasingly play a key role, particularly in patients with limited life expectancy, hostile thoracic anatomy, or high surgical risk. Outcomes are heterogeneous and largely driven by cancer stage and prognosis rather than cardiac pathology alone. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cardiac surgery can be lifesaving and restore eligibility for definitive oncologic therapy in carefully selected patients, particularly those with early-stage or potentially curable malignancies. In advanced cancer, the benefits of invasive intervention must be weighed against perioperative burden, quality of life impact, and overall prognosis. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered decision-making within specialized cardio-oncology teams is essential. Future priorities include the development of cancer-specific risk prediction models, prospective surgical registries, and greater integration of quality-of-life outcomes into clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050748
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac Surgery in Cancer Patients: Clinical Dilemmas and Decision-Making Challenges

KALLIOPI KERAMIDA, Vasiliki A. Androutsopoulou, Helena Michalopoulou, Dorothea Tsekoura et al.
Cancers
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
article

Cardiac Surgery in Cancer Patients: Clinical Dilemmas and Decision-Making Challenges

KALLIOPI KERAMIDA, Vasiliki A. Androutsopoulou, Helena Michalopoulou, Dorothea Tsekoura, Apostolοs Roubelakis
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Improvements in cancer detection and treatment have led to a growing population of cancer survivors who subsequently develop cardiovascular (CV) disease requiring cardiac surgery. <b>Methods:</b> This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence from observational studies, registries, meta-analyses, and international guidelines addressing cardiac surgery in patients with active or prior cancer. <b>Results:</b> Cancer patients undergoing cardiac surgery face heightened risks related to hypercoagulability, bleeding, immunosuppression, frailty, and prior exposure to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Conventional surgical risk scores inadequately capture cancer-specific factors such as tumor biology, prognosis, treatment trajectory, and frailty, often underestimating operative risk. Timing of surgery must balance CV urgency against oncologic priorities, with urgent cardiac conditions necessitating prompt intervention irrespective of cancer status, while stable disease allows individualized sequencing. Transcatheter and minimally invasive approaches increasingly play a key role, particularly in patients with limited life expectancy, hostile thoracic anatomy, or high surgical risk. Outcomes are heterogeneous and largely driven by cancer stage and prognosis rather than cardiac pathology alone. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cardiac surgery can be lifesaving and restore eligibility for definitive oncologic therapy in carefully selected patients, particularly those with early-stage or potentially curable malignancies. In advanced cancer, the benefits of invasive intervention must be weighed against perioperative burden, quality of life impact, and overall prognosis. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered decision-making within specialized cardio-oncology teams is essential. Future priorities include the development of cancer-specific risk prediction models, prospective surgical registries, and greater integration of quality-of-life outcomes into clinical decision-making.

CancersVol. 18(5)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University Hospital of Larissa (GR), Laiko General Hospital of Athens (GR), Aretaeio Hospital (GR), St Savas Hospital (GR), Athens Medical Center (GR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.