Beyond the cage: The rise and promise of non-animal models in biomedical research

The accelerating shift in biomedical research toward human-relevant, ethical, and innovative methodologies has propelled the adoption of Non-animal models (NAMs) as vital alternatives to traditional animal models. This review examines the different types of NAMs, including in vitro models such as 2D cell cultures, organoids, spheroids, organs-on-a-chip, and advanced in silico tools such as artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models, molecular docking, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) approaches, in the context of their capacity to replace, reduce, and refine animal use. Drawing on historical and contemporary applications, we analyze the experimental utility, translational value, and limitations of each NAM against the benchmark of well-established animal models, emphasizing the ability of NAMs to capture human physiology, enhance throughput, and address ethical imperatives. Despite significant progress, NAMs face challenges in recapitulating systemic complexity and regulatory standardization. The review identifies current technological gaps and articulates future directions, with particular emphasis on multi-organ platforms, computational innovations, and data harmonization. Ultimately, continual advances in NAMs, coupled with evolving regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations, are redefining the standards and trajectory of preclinical biomedical research, paving the way toward safer, more predictive, and humane scientific practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pharmacology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2026.178686
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the cage: The rise and promise of non-animal models in biomedical research

Ema Pavlović, Gert Folkerts, Johan Garssen, Shritama Dutta
European Journal of Pharmacology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Beyond the cage: The rise and promise of non-animal models in biomedical research

Ema Pavlović, Gert Folkerts, Johan Garssen, Shritama Dutta
article en

Abstract

The accelerating shift in biomedical research toward human-relevant, ethical, and innovative methodologies has propelled the adoption of Non-animal models (NAMs) as vital alternatives to traditional animal models. This review examines the different types of NAMs, including in vitro models such as 2D cell cultures, organoids, spheroids, organs-on-a-chip, and advanced in silico tools such as artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models, molecular docking, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) approaches, in the context of their capacity to replace, reduce, and refine animal use. Drawing on historical and contemporary applications, we analyze the experimental utility, translational value, and limitations of each NAM against the benchmark of well-established animal models, emphasizing the ability of NAMs to capture human physiology, enhance throughput, and address ethical imperatives. Despite significant progress, NAMs face challenges in recapitulating systemic complexity and regulatory standardization. The review identifies current technological gaps and articulates future directions, with particular emphasis on multi-organ platforms, computational innovations, and data harmonization. Ultimately, continual advances in NAMs, coupled with evolving regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations, are redefining the standards and trajectory of preclinical biomedical research, paving the way toward safer, more predictive, and humane scientific practices.

European Journal of PharmacologyVol. 1019
Utrecht University (NL), Pharmo Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.