אם שלמים or משל מים in Nah. 1.12: A study of the ancient translations

Is the phrase אם שׁלמים‎ or משׁל מים‎ found in Nah. 1.12? The textual tradition is divided. The Septuagint (LXX) and the Peshitta support the reading משׁל מים‎ in Nah. 1.12, whereas the Masoretic text, the Targum, and the Vulgate preserve אם שׁלמים‎ (‘though they are at full strength‘ or ‘though they are complete’). This disagreement prompts significant inquiries regarding the verse’s initial phrasing, its interpretation, and the origins of the differing readings that arose during the transmission process. This article utilizes textual criticism as its main approach—analyzing manuscript evidence, assessing the likelihood of transcription and translation variations, and considering contextual and linguistic elements—to identify the most probable original text and to explore the potential explanations for the discrepancies among these ancient sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03090892251377085
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

אם שלמים or משל מים in Nah. 1.12: A study of the ancient translations

Philip Suciadi Chia
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

אם שלמים or משל מים in Nah. 1.12: A study of the ancient translations

Philip Suciadi Chia
article en

Abstract

Is the phrase אם שׁלמים‎ or משׁל מים‎ found in Nah. 1.12? The textual tradition is divided. The Septuagint (LXX) and the Peshitta support the reading משׁל מים‎ in Nah. 1.12, whereas the Masoretic text, the Targum, and the Vulgate preserve אם שׁלמים‎ (‘though they are at full strength‘ or ‘though they are complete’). This disagreement prompts significant inquiries regarding the verse’s initial phrasing, its interpretation, and the origins of the differing readings that arose during the transmission process. This article utilizes textual criticism as its main approach—analyzing manuscript evidence, assessing the likelihood of transcription and translation variations, and considering contextual and linguistic elements—to identify the most probable original text and to explore the potential explanations for the discrepancies among these ancient sources.

Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Garrett–Evangelical Theological Seminary (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.