Characterizing household air pollutant concentrations associated with an electrification program in the rural San Joaquin Valley

Indoor nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are concerns in U.S. households, especially those that cook using gas or propane stoves. Exposures to these and other indoor pollutants are linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes, including asthma morbidity, that disproportionately affect low-income households. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 138 homes in four low-income rural communities in California's San Joaquin Valley, comparing air pollutant concentrations between households that participated in a state electrification program and households using propane or natural gas for cooking. In each home, pollutants were monitored for approximately one month using personal air monitors and for 48 h using reference-grade instruments. Median 48-h average indoor NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were 63% lower in electric stove homes (electric: 6.0 ppb, gas: 16.0 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No electric stove homes had 48-h indoor NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations exceeding the California annual guideline of 30 ppb, while 17% of gas homes did. Additionally, no electric stove homes had 1-h rolling-average NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations exceeding the 100-ppb level deemed unhealthy for sensitive groups by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, whereas 41% of gas homes exceeded this threshold. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were similar across groups, indicating that cooking-related emissions from food were the dominant contributor to PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations rather than particles generated from gas combustion. Our evaluation of monitoring durations showed that two to four days of NO<sub>2</sub> data and one week of PM<sub>2.5</sub> data provided reliable estimates of longer-term averages, suggesting that shorter campaigns may yield robust estimates of indoor air quality. These results support the provision of electric cooking technologies as a strategy to address air quality-related health risks in rural, low-income communities and provide new evidence from an understudied population that can inform future indoor air quality research and energy transition policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Health
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ae4ac9
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing household air pollutant concentrations associated with an electrification program in the rural San Joaquin Valley

Jessica Tryner, Tim R. Tyner, Jesus Daniel Martínez Rivera, Misbath Daouda et al.
Environmental Research Health
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Characterizing household air pollutant concentrations associated with an electrification program in the rural San Joaquin Valley

Jessica Tryner, Tim R. Tyner, Jesus Daniel Martínez Rivera, Misbath Daouda, Michael A Johnson, Ahana Ghosh, Maria Fe Aragon, Ajay Pillarisetti, Heather Miller, Sydney Jones
article en

Abstract

Indoor nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are concerns in U.S. households, especially those that cook using gas or propane stoves. Exposures to these and other indoor pollutants are linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes, including asthma morbidity, that disproportionately affect low-income households. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 138 homes in four low-income rural communities in California's San Joaquin Valley, comparing air pollutant concentrations between households that participated in a state electrification program and households using propane or natural gas for cooking. In each home, pollutants were monitored for approximately one month using personal air monitors and for 48 h using reference-grade instruments. Median 48-h average indoor NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were 63% lower in electric stove homes (electric: 6.0 ppb, gas: 16.0 ppb, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No electric stove homes had 48-h indoor NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations exceeding the California annual guideline of 30 ppb, while 17% of gas homes did. Additionally, no electric stove homes had 1-h rolling-average NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations exceeding the 100-ppb level deemed unhealthy for sensitive groups by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, whereas 41% of gas homes exceeded this threshold. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were similar across groups, indicating that cooking-related emissions from food were the dominant contributor to PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations rather than particles generated from gas combustion. Our evaluation of monitoring durations showed that two to four days of NO<sub>2</sub> data and one week of PM<sub>2.5</sub> data provided reliable estimates of longer-term averages, suggesting that shorter campaigns may yield robust estimates of indoor air quality. These results support the provision of electric cooking technologies as a strategy to address air quality-related health risks in rural, low-income communities and provide new evidence from an understudied population that can inform future indoor air quality research and energy transition policies.

Environmental Research HealthVol. 4(2)
Berkeley Air Monitoring Group (United States) (US), VA Central California Health Care System (US), Access Sensor Technologies (United States) (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.