Challenges and Strategies of NASICON‐Type Solid‐State Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium Batteries

Owing to their high safety and energy density, all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are regarded as one of the most promising next-generation energy storage systems and have attracted significant attention. However, their large-scale deployment remains hindered by technical challenges, including interfacial issues between solid electrolytes and electrodes, dendrite growth, and poor cycling and rate performance. In particular, the limited ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes is widely regarded as one of the key factors constraining battery performance. Among them, NASICON-type solid electrolytes stand out as multifunctional oxide materials with rigid frameworks and excellent thermal stability, making them suitable for applications such as lithium-ion ASSBs. Nevertheless, they also face challenges of insufficient ionic conductivity and poor interfacial stability. This work reviews recent strategies to address these issues, conduct an in-depth analysis of its mechanism of action and effect, and evaluate its advantages, disadvantages, and development potential. To improve ionic conductivity, we discuss element doping, synthesis and fabrication methods, sintering additives, and densification strategies. To mitigate interfacial instability, we summarize approaches such as inorganic protective layers, composite electrolytes, and hot-pressing or hot-forming techniques. These insights provide both theoretical guidance and practical references for designing and developing high-performance, stable NASICON-type solid electrolytes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemPhysChem
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202500662
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Strategies of NASICON‐Type Solid‐State Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium Batteries

Chenhang Zhang, Miaomiao Lyu, Chuangji Bi, SiJia Liu et al.
ChemPhysChem
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Challenges and Strategies of NASICON‐Type Solid‐State Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium Batteries

Chenhang Zhang, Miaomiao Lyu, Chuangji Bi, SiJia Liu, Yuan Li, Wendong Xue, Zichen Liu, Lei Chai
article en

Abstract

Owing to their high safety and energy density, all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are regarded as one of the most promising next-generation energy storage systems and have attracted significant attention. However, their large-scale deployment remains hindered by technical challenges, including interfacial issues between solid electrolytes and electrodes, dendrite growth, and poor cycling and rate performance. In particular, the limited ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes is widely regarded as one of the key factors constraining battery performance. Among them, NASICON-type solid electrolytes stand out as multifunctional oxide materials with rigid frameworks and excellent thermal stability, making them suitable for applications such as lithium-ion ASSBs. Nevertheless, they also face challenges of insufficient ionic conductivity and poor interfacial stability. This work reviews recent strategies to address these issues, conduct an in-depth analysis of its mechanism of action and effect, and evaluate its advantages, disadvantages, and development potential. To improve ionic conductivity, we discuss element doping, synthesis and fabrication methods, sintering additives, and densification strategies. To mitigate interfacial instability, we summarize approaches such as inorganic protective layers, composite electrolytes, and hot-pressing or hot-forming techniques. These insights provide both theoretical guidance and practical references for designing and developing high-performance, stable NASICON-type solid electrolytes.

ChemPhysChemVol. 27(4)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.