The forest carbon paradox: novel insights into China’s forest-economy-emissions relationships

Forest-climate-economy relationships present critical challenges for climate mitigation in rapidly developing economies. While forests are traditionally viewed as carbon sinks, their effectiveness as tradable carbon products remains difficult to quantify in the near term due to time lags and scale mismatch with energy-driven emissions dynamics. This study examines these relationships in China using data from 30 provinces (from 2000 to 2019). Using LSTM-MLP hybrid models and multispatial Convergent Cross Mapping, we reveal what we term the “forest carbon paradox”: despite China’s extensive afforestation efforts increasing forest coverage significantly, these initiatives demonstrate limited immediate impact on CO₂ emissions and GDP trajectories. Energy consumption variables, particularly electricity and natural gas, consistently emerged as the dominant drivers of both emissions and economic growth, while forest coverage showed minimal predictive power in our models. Causal analysis revealed asymmetric relationships: CO₂ emissions strongly influenced forest coverage (0.88) versus weaker reverse effects (0.49), suggesting policy-driven afforestation responses rather than direct ecological feedback mechanisms. These findings highlight the need for paradigm shifts in forest carbon valuation strategies that account for temporal complexities in forest-economy-emissions relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00350-w
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The forest carbon paradox: novel insights into China’s forest-economy-emissions relationships

K. Y. Zhang, Chuanxin Ma, Ling Chen, Changlei Xia et al.
npj Climate Action
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

The forest carbon paradox: novel insights into China’s forest-economy-emissions relationships

K. Y. Zhang, Chuanxin Ma, Ling Chen, Changlei Xia, Jiangang Han, Yu Hao, Wenjuan Shen, Zihan Zhang, Yu Shen, Zhelin Sheng, Keyi Chen
article en

Abstract

Forest-climate-economy relationships present critical challenges for climate mitigation in rapidly developing economies. While forests are traditionally viewed as carbon sinks, their effectiveness as tradable carbon products remains difficult to quantify in the near term due to time lags and scale mismatch with energy-driven emissions dynamics. This study examines these relationships in China using data from 30 provinces (from 2000 to 2019). Using LSTM-MLP hybrid models and multispatial Convergent Cross Mapping, we reveal what we term the “forest carbon paradox”: despite China’s extensive afforestation efforts increasing forest coverage significantly, these initiatives demonstrate limited immediate impact on CO₂ emissions and GDP trajectories. Energy consumption variables, particularly electricity and natural gas, consistently emerged as the dominant drivers of both emissions and economic growth, while forest coverage showed minimal predictive power in our models. Causal analysis revealed asymmetric relationships: CO₂ emissions strongly influenced forest coverage (0.88) versus weaker reverse effects (0.49), suggesting policy-driven afforestation responses rather than direct ecological feedback mechanisms. These findings highlight the need for paradigm shifts in forest carbon valuation strategies that account for temporal complexities in forest-economy-emissions relationships.

npj Climate ActionVol. 5(1)
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Ministry of Education (BN), Changzhou Institute of Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Research Institute of Forestry (CN), Key Laboratory of Nuclear Radiation and Nuclear Energy Technology (CN), Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.