Enhanced interaural separation improves spatial release from masking in bilateral bone conduction hearing

Objectives Bone conduction (BC) stimulation inherently produces low interaural separation due to cross-head transmission, which limits binaural benefits when BC stimulation is applied bilaterally. This study aimed to determine the improvement in binaural hearing from attenuation of BC cross-head transmission, as quantified by spatial release from masking (SRM), and to compare these outcomes with bilateral air-conduction (AC) stimulation. Methods Twenty normal-hearing adults participated. BC stimulation was simulated using AC headphones combined with an averaged cross-head transmission model representative of mastoid stimulation. Speech-in-noise performance was measured using the Swedish Matrix Test. SRM was calculated as the difference in speech reception thresholds between co-located speech and noise (S 0 N 0 ) and spatially separated condition (S 0 N 45 ). Four stimulation conditions were tested: AC stimulation, simulated BC with unattenuated cross-head transmission, and simulated BC with the same transmission attenuated by 5 dB and 10 dB. Results SRM increased systematically with increasing attenuation of BC cross-head transmission. Unattenuated BC stimulation produced the lowest SRM (mean 3.21 dB). Attenuation by 5 dB significantly improved SRM to 5.46 dB, while 10 dB attenuation further increased SRM to 6.47 dB. AC stimulation yielded the highest SRM (7.16 dB). SRM with 10 dB cross-head attenuation did not differ significantly from AC stimulation, whereas SRM with 5 dB cross-head attenuation remained significantly lower than AC. Conclusion Partial attenuation of BC cross-head transmission substantially improves binaural speech-in-noise performance. A reduction of 5 dB gives a meaningful binaural benefit, while a 10 dB reduction produces SRM comparable to bilateral AC stimulation. These findings indicate that robust attenuation, rather than precise cancellation, of BC cross-head transmission may be sufficient to enhance binaural hearing in bilateral BC applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2026.1771617
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced interaural separation improves spatial release from masking in bilateral bone conduction hearing

Hoda Jalalkamali, Stefan Stenfelt, Sudeep Surendran
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Enhanced interaural separation improves spatial release from masking in bilateral bone conduction hearing

Hoda Jalalkamali, Stefan Stenfelt, Sudeep Surendran
article en

Abstract

Objectives Bone conduction (BC) stimulation inherently produces low interaural separation due to cross-head transmission, which limits binaural benefits when BC stimulation is applied bilaterally. This study aimed to determine the improvement in binaural hearing from attenuation of BC cross-head transmission, as quantified by spatial release from masking (SRM), and to compare these outcomes with bilateral air-conduction (AC) stimulation. Methods Twenty normal-hearing adults participated. BC stimulation was simulated using AC headphones combined with an averaged cross-head transmission model representative of mastoid stimulation. Speech-in-noise performance was measured using the Swedish Matrix Test. SRM was calculated as the difference in speech reception thresholds between co-located speech and noise (S 0 N 0 ) and spatially separated condition (S 0 N 45 ). Four stimulation conditions were tested: AC stimulation, simulated BC with unattenuated cross-head transmission, and simulated BC with the same transmission attenuated by 5 dB and 10 dB. Results SRM increased systematically with increasing attenuation of BC cross-head transmission. Unattenuated BC stimulation produced the lowest SRM (mean 3.21 dB). Attenuation by 5 dB significantly improved SRM to 5.46 dB, while 10 dB attenuation further increased SRM to 6.47 dB. AC stimulation yielded the highest SRM (7.16 dB). SRM with 10 dB cross-head attenuation did not differ significantly from AC stimulation, whereas SRM with 5 dB cross-head attenuation remained significantly lower than AC. Conclusion Partial attenuation of BC cross-head transmission substantially improves binaural speech-in-noise performance. A reduction of 5 dB gives a meaningful binaural benefit, while a 10 dB reduction produces SRM comparable to bilateral AC stimulation. These findings indicate that robust attenuation, rather than precise cancellation, of BC cross-head transmission may be sufficient to enhance binaural hearing in bilateral BC applications.

Frontiers in Audiology and OtologyVol. 4
Linköping University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.