Test of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathsize="small">G</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">E</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi

The reduced cross section of the semiexclusive <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mi>l</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>l</a:mi> <a:mo>′</a:mo> </a:msup> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:math> lepton scattering process irrespective of the type of interaction is determined mainly by the bound nucleon momentum distribution in the target and nucleon final state interaction with the residual nucleus. These cross sections can be identified with distorted nuclear spectral functions and therefore, they are similar up to Coulomb corrections for neutrino and electron scattering on nuclei. In this article, we exploit this similarity and use data with precise kinematics and large statistics for semiexclusive electron scattering on an oxygen target to test models employed in the neutrino event generator. We find that these models cannot reproduce well the measured reduced cross sections in all allowed kinematic regions and the event generator needs to describe better both the nuclear ground states and nucleon final state interaction. The approach presented in this paper provides a great opportunity to better test the accuracy of nuclear models of quasielastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, employed in neutrino event generators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/326r-sr5s
Primary Topic
Neutrino Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathsize="small">G</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">E</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi

Anonymous
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Neutrino Physics Research
article

Test of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathsize="small">G</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">E</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">N</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathsize="small">I</mml:mi> <mml:mi

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

The reduced cross section of the semiexclusive <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mi>l</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>l</a:mi> <a:mo>′</a:mo> </a:msup> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:math> lepton scattering process irrespective of the type of interaction is determined mainly by the bound nucleon momentum distribution in the target and nucleon final state interaction with the residual nucleus. These cross sections can be identified with distorted nuclear spectral functions and therefore, they are similar up to Coulomb corrections for neutrino and electron scattering on nuclei. In this article, we exploit this similarity and use data with precise kinematics and large statistics for semiexclusive electron scattering on an oxygen target to test models employed in the neutrino event generator. We find that these models cannot reproduce well the measured reduced cross sections in all allowed kinematic regions and the event generator needs to describe better both the nuclear ground states and nucleon final state interaction. The approach presented in this paper provides a great opportunity to better test the accuracy of nuclear models of quasielastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, employed in neutrino event generators.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Neutrino Physics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.