Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Type LiDAR Sensors and Their Applicability to Sidewalk HD Mapping

Sidewalk high-definition (HD) maps require centimetre-level representation of pedestrian barriers to support mobility assistance and barrier-free infrastructure management. This study evaluates six mobile light detection and ranging (LiDAR) platforms for sidewalk HD mapping: terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), a push-cart mobile mapping system (MMS), two backpack systems (GNSS/INS (Global Navigation Satellite System/Inertial Navigation System)-aided and SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping)-based), and two handheld systems (GNSS/INS-aided and SLAM-based). Surveys were conducted at two sites with contrasting occlusion and GNSS conditions (park and dense downtown corridors). Point clouds were transformed to a common control network, with independent checkpoints for absolute accuracy. The reference dataset achieved a planimetric root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.017-0.049 m and vertical RMSE of 0.009-0.014 m across sites. Platforms were compared for positional accuracy, point density, and extractability of key accessibility attributes (effective width, step height, and longitudinal slope). Cart-mounted MMS provided stable geometry under occlusion, while SLAM-based handheld mapping improved robustness in GNSS-degraded areas; backpack SLAM performance depended on loop-closure opportunities and scene dynamics. We provide guidance on selecting pedestrian-scale LiDAR platforms for sidewalk HD mapping under different survey conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051480
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Type LiDAR Sensors and Their Applicability to Sidewalk HD Mapping

Dongjin Lee, Jaecheol Lee, Sungho Kang, Junghyun Kim
Sensors
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Type LiDAR Sensors and Their Applicability to Sidewalk HD Mapping

Dongjin Lee, Jaecheol Lee, Sungho Kang, Junghyun Kim
article en

Abstract

Sidewalk high-definition (HD) maps require centimetre-level representation of pedestrian barriers to support mobility assistance and barrier-free infrastructure management. This study evaluates six mobile light detection and ranging (LiDAR) platforms for sidewalk HD mapping: terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), a push-cart mobile mapping system (MMS), two backpack systems (GNSS/INS (Global Navigation Satellite System/Inertial Navigation System)-aided and SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping)-based), and two handheld systems (GNSS/INS-aided and SLAM-based). Surveys were conducted at two sites with contrasting occlusion and GNSS conditions (park and dense downtown corridors). Point clouds were transformed to a common control network, with independent checkpoints for absolute accuracy. The reference dataset achieved a planimetric root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.017-0.049 m and vertical RMSE of 0.009-0.014 m across sites. Platforms were compared for positional accuracy, point density, and extractability of key accessibility attributes (effective width, step height, and longitudinal slope). Cart-mounted MMS provided stable geometry under occlusion, while SLAM-based handheld mapping improved robustness in GNSS-degraded areas; backpack SLAM performance depended on loop-closure opportunities and scene dynamics. We provide guidance on selecting pedestrian-scale LiDAR platforms for sidewalk HD mapping under different survey conditions.

SensorsVol. 26(5)
Kangwon National University (KR), Gyeongsang National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.