Experimental Evaluation of Laterally Skewed Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with and without Composite Concrete Slabs

Existing experimental reduced beam section (RBS) moment frame investigations, particularly those used for prequalification, consider orthogonally oriented beam-to-column connections. While the design commentary provided in current prequalification standards refers to recent skewed special moment frame (SMF) numerical studies and potential performance effects when a lateral beam skew is introduced, no experimental studies have been performed to verify the numerical findings. This study presents an experimental investigation into the cyclic behavior of RBS special moment frames that have lateral skew at the beam-to-column connection. Testing involves both bare-steel and composite skewed moment frame connections. In this study, a total of six single-sided bare-steel RBS connections having two column depths (W14× and W24×) and three skew angles (10°, 20°, and 30°) are considered, along with one composite double-sided RBS connection tested under two different beam bracing conditions (with and without beam bottom flange bracing outside the RBS). Experimental results indicate that current provisions for RBS SMF design can be applied to laterally skewed configurations; however, it is recommended that beam lateral bracing be included within d/2 from the end of the RBS for all connections having beam skews greater than 10°, even if a composite concrete slab is included. Column torsional bracing should be included near the bottom of the beam-to-column connection for medium and deep columns (W24× or deeper) having beam skews greater than 20°. Shallow (W14×) columns having beam bracing at d/2 from the RBS performed satisfactorily (based on current prequalification requirements) at skews up to 30°. Medium (W24×) columns having beam bracing at d/2 from the RBS performed satisfactorily at skews up to 20°, with no observable column flange yielding and moderate column twist. The W24× column configuration at 30° skew also performed satisfactorily based on prequalification requirements; however, the extent of observed column twisting raises stability concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-15219
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Evaluation of Laterally Skewed Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with and without Composite Concrete Slabs

Pratik Ghimire, A. Kirchner, M. H. Kashefizadeh, G. S. Prinz
Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Experimental Evaluation of Laterally Skewed Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with and without Composite Concrete Slabs

Pratik Ghimire, A. Kirchner, M. H. Kashefizadeh, G. S. Prinz
article en

Abstract

Existing experimental reduced beam section (RBS) moment frame investigations, particularly those used for prequalification, consider orthogonally oriented beam-to-column connections. While the design commentary provided in current prequalification standards refers to recent skewed special moment frame (SMF) numerical studies and potential performance effects when a lateral beam skew is introduced, no experimental studies have been performed to verify the numerical findings. This study presents an experimental investigation into the cyclic behavior of RBS special moment frames that have lateral skew at the beam-to-column connection. Testing involves both bare-steel and composite skewed moment frame connections. In this study, a total of six single-sided bare-steel RBS connections having two column depths (W14× and W24×) and three skew angles (10°, 20°, and 30°) are considered, along with one composite double-sided RBS connection tested under two different beam bracing conditions (with and without beam bottom flange bracing outside the RBS). Experimental results indicate that current provisions for RBS SMF design can be applied to laterally skewed configurations; however, it is recommended that beam lateral bracing be included within d/2 from the end of the RBS for all connections having beam skews greater than 10°, even if a composite concrete slab is included. Column torsional bracing should be included near the bottom of the beam-to-column connection for medium and deep columns (W24× or deeper) having beam skews greater than 20°. Shallow (W14×) columns having beam bracing at d/2 from the RBS performed satisfactorily (based on current prequalification requirements) at skews up to 30°. Medium (W24×) columns having beam bracing at d/2 from the RBS performed satisfactorily at skews up to 20°, with no observable column flange yielding and moderate column twist. The W24× column configuration at 30° skew also performed satisfactorily based on prequalification requirements; however, the extent of observed column twisting raises stability concerns.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 152(5)
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.