Multi-source precipitation fusion for hydrological models: Correction and metrics importance analysis

The Ganjiang River Basin, a major humid subtropical tributary of the Yangtze River located in southeastern China. This study develops a lightweight and interpretable precipitation merging framework based on Absolute Distance Inverse Weighting (ADIW) to integrate eight mainstream precipitation datasets (CHIRPS, CMORPH, ERA5, GSMaP, IMERG, PERSIANN, SM2RAIN, TRMM) from 2008 to 2020. The performance of the merged product, corrected with four methods (Linear Regression-LR, Linear Scaling, Quantile Mapping, Quantile–Quantile), was rigorously evaluated through hydrological simulation using the HYPE and VIC models. Results show that: (1) The ADIW merging framework effectively synthesizes multiple datasets, yielding a product with superior correlation and rainfall detection skill compared to any individual input, despite a slight underestimation. (2) While all four bias-correction methods effectively mitigated systematic errors, Linear Regression (LR) proved the most robust and consistent in enhancing both precipitation accuracy and subsequent runoff simulations. (3) Consequently, the combined ADIW+LR approach delivered the optimal hydrological performance, achieving the highest Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency values in both models. (4) Diagnostic analysis identified ERA5 and GSMaP as the most influential datasets contributing to the merged product, and established that relative bias (RB) and mean absolute error (MAE) are the key metrics controlling hydrological reliability. • ADIW method enables lightweight merging of multiple precipitation data sources. • Four bias-correction methods significantly improve hydrological modeling performance. • Dynamic ADIW with moving window enhances merged precipitation for runoff simulation. • RB and MAE identified as most critical precipitation metrics for hydrological modeling. • Merged-LR outperforms benchmark MSWEP in both HYPE and VIC hydrological models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103291
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-source precipitation fusion for hydrological models: Correction and metrics importance analysis

Chengguo Wu, Shaowei Ning, Juliang Jin, Bhesh Raj Thapa et al.
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Multi-source precipitation fusion for hydrological models: Correction and metrics importance analysis

Chengguo Wu, Shaowei Ning, Juliang Jin, Bhesh Raj Thapa, Yi Cui, Yuliang Zhou, Yang Cheng, Min Zhang
article en

Abstract

The Ganjiang River Basin, a major humid subtropical tributary of the Yangtze River located in southeastern China. This study develops a lightweight and interpretable precipitation merging framework based on Absolute Distance Inverse Weighting (ADIW) to integrate eight mainstream precipitation datasets (CHIRPS, CMORPH, ERA5, GSMaP, IMERG, PERSIANN, SM2RAIN, TRMM) from 2008 to 2020. The performance of the merged product, corrected with four methods (Linear Regression-LR, Linear Scaling, Quantile Mapping, Quantile–Quantile), was rigorously evaluated through hydrological simulation using the HYPE and VIC models. Results show that: (1) The ADIW merging framework effectively synthesizes multiple datasets, yielding a product with superior correlation and rainfall detection skill compared to any individual input, despite a slight underestimation. (2) While all four bias-correction methods effectively mitigated systematic errors, Linear Regression (LR) proved the most robust and consistent in enhancing both precipitation accuracy and subsequent runoff simulations. (3) Consequently, the combined ADIW+LR approach delivered the optimal hydrological performance, achieving the highest Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency values in both models. (4) Diagnostic analysis identified ERA5 and GSMaP as the most influential datasets contributing to the merged product, and established that relative bias (RB) and mean absolute error (MAE) are the key metrics controlling hydrological reliability. • ADIW method enables lightweight merging of multiple precipitation data sources. • Four bias-correction methods significantly improve hydrological modeling performance. • Dynamic ADIW with moving window enhances merged precipitation for runoff simulation. • RB and MAE identified as most critical precipitation metrics for hydrological modeling. • Merged-LR outperforms benchmark MSWEP in both HYPE and VIC hydrological models.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 64
Electric Power Research Institute (US), Pokhara University (NP), Hefei University of Technology (CN), State Nuclear Power Technology Company (China) (CN), Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.