Evaluation of the Accuracy of Probabilistic Record Linkage Across Sociodemographic Categories in 4 Databases: Exploratory Study

Probabilistic patient matching accuracy is not uniform across demographics and is strongly influenced by data quality and completeness. Although overall matching performance, as assessed by the F1-score, remained above 0.8, it varied across datasets when stratified by sociodemographic characteristics. Sociodemographic data missingness is associated with lower matching accuracy, raising equity and ethical concerns for clinical, research, and public health applications. Routine demographic-stratified evaluations of matching accuracy, improved standardization of sociodemographic data, and fairness-aware linkage methods are essential to prevent the amplification of structural inequities in linked health datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/78622
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Probabilistic Record Linkage Across Sociodemographic Categories in 4 Databases: Exploratory Study

Lauren R. Lembcke, Cristina Barboi, Katie Allen, Fangqian Ouyang et al.
JMIR Formative Research
Data Quality and Management
article

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Probabilistic Record Linkage Across Sociodemographic Categories in 4 Databases: Exploratory Study

Lauren R. Lembcke, Cristina Barboi, Katie Allen, Fangqian Ouyang, Xiaochun Li, Huiping Xu, Ashley Griffith, Shaun J Grannis, Andrew Martin
article en

Abstract

Probabilistic patient matching accuracy is not uniform across demographics and is strongly influenced by data quality and completeness. Although overall matching performance, as assessed by the F1-score, remained above 0.8, it varied across datasets when stratified by sociodemographic characteristics. Sociodemographic data missingness is associated with lower matching accuracy, raising equity and ethical concerns for clinical, research, and public health applications. Routine demographic-stratified evaluations of matching accuracy, improved standardization of sociodemographic data, and fairness-aware linkage methods are essential to prevent the amplification of structural inequities in linked health datasets.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 10
Indiana University Health (US), Regenstrief Institute (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.