The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status on the Incidence of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery

Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are among the most serious complications following colorectal surgery, contributing to significant morbidity, reoperation, and prolonged hospitalisation. Poor preoperative nutritional status has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor; however, evidence from studies remains inconsistent. This systematic review, conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420251034523), synthesised findings from 32 eligible studies, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control designs, published between 2005 and 2025. Across 474 initially identified articles, nutritional status was assessed using serum albumin, body mass index (BMI), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), or Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). AL incidence ranged from 2.8% to 11.3%, with hypoalbuminaemia and low nutritional indices consistently associated with increased risk. Several studies have suggested that nutritional optimisation, particularly immunonutrition and enteral support initiated 7-14 days preoperatively, improves secondary outcomes, such as wound infection rates, hospital stay, and overall morbidity. However, reductions in leak incidence are less consistent. The certainty of evidence linking poor nutritional status to leak risk was rated as moderate, while the evidence for nutritional interventions was rated as low due to heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Perioperative factors, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and steroid use, were also significant contributors to leak risk. Overall, nutritional status is a key, modifiable predictor of AL; however, integration with surgical and perioperative optimisation is essential. High-quality multicentre trials are needed to define optimal nutritional strategies and establish standardised risk assessment tools for clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104329
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status on the Incidence of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery

Mohammad Alatoom, Ulla Elfadil, Abdulrahman Al-Majmuei, Abrar Shukralla et al.
Cureus
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

The Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Status on the Incidence of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery

Mohammad Alatoom, Ulla Elfadil, Abdulrahman Al-Majmuei, Abrar Shukralla, Sarah Juma
article en

Abstract

Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are among the most serious complications following colorectal surgery, contributing to significant morbidity, reoperation, and prolonged hospitalisation. Poor preoperative nutritional status has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor; however, evidence from studies remains inconsistent. This systematic review, conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420251034523), synthesised findings from 32 eligible studies, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control designs, published between 2005 and 2025. Across 474 initially identified articles, nutritional status was assessed using serum albumin, body mass index (BMI), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), or Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). AL incidence ranged from 2.8% to 11.3%, with hypoalbuminaemia and low nutritional indices consistently associated with increased risk. Several studies have suggested that nutritional optimisation, particularly immunonutrition and enteral support initiated 7-14 days preoperatively, improves secondary outcomes, such as wound infection rates, hospital stay, and overall morbidity. However, reductions in leak incidence are less consistent. The certainty of evidence linking poor nutritional status to leak risk was rated as moderate, while the evidence for nutritional interventions was rated as low due to heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Perioperative factors, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and steroid use, were also significant contributors to leak risk. Overall, nutritional status is a key, modifiable predictor of AL; however, integration with surgical and perioperative optimisation is essential. High-quality multicentre trials are needed to define optimal nutritional strategies and establish standardised risk assessment tools for clinical practice.

Cureus
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.