Evaluating the analytical performance of direct-to-consumer gut microbiome testing services

Consumer interest in personal microbiome health has given rise to numerous direct-to-consumer (DTC) microbiome testing services despite questions regarding their analytical and clinical validity, and consumer safety. These tests straddle the line between more strictly regulated medical devices and minimally regulated general health and wellness products; a distinction that may not be readily apparent to consumers. To assess the current state of the industry, we evaluated the performance of seven DTC gut microbiome testing services using a standardized NIST-developed human fecal material. Our results reveal major discrepancies, both within and across the different service providers. Significantly, we found variability between providers was on the same scale as biological variability between different donors. We attribute the observed differences to methodological variability and lack of sufficient quality control. Additionally, we highlight that analytical performance is a prerequisite for making sound clinical recommendations. Our results demonstrate the need for standards to ensure analytical validity and consumer confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09301-3
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the analytical performance of direct-to-consumer gut microbiome testing services

Stephanie L. Servetas, Kristine Gierz, Diane Hoffmann, Jacques Ravel et al.
Communications Biology
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Evaluating the analytical performance of direct-to-consumer gut microbiome testing services

Stephanie L. Servetas, Kristine Gierz, Diane Hoffmann, Jacques Ravel, Scott A. Jackson
article en

Abstract

Consumer interest in personal microbiome health has given rise to numerous direct-to-consumer (DTC) microbiome testing services despite questions regarding their analytical and clinical validity, and consumer safety. These tests straddle the line between more strictly regulated medical devices and minimally regulated general health and wellness products; a distinction that may not be readily apparent to consumers. To assess the current state of the industry, we evaluated the performance of seven DTC gut microbiome testing services using a standardized NIST-developed human fecal material. Our results reveal major discrepancies, both within and across the different service providers. Significantly, we found variability between providers was on the same scale as biological variability between different donors. We attribute the observed differences to methodological variability and lack of sufficient quality control. Additionally, we highlight that analytical performance is a prerequisite for making sound clinical recommendations. Our results demonstrate the need for standards to ensure analytical validity and consumer confidence.

Communications BiologyVol. 9(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), RED Consulting (Norway) (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.