Can Reward Uncertainty Encourage Social Referrals? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Social referral programs, in which individuals recommend products or services within their networks in return for rewards, have been widely adopted across digital platforms. This study explores the impact of incorporating uncertainty into the rewards of such programs, focusing on how senders and recipients perceive and react to uncertain rewards. We run a randomized experiment involving more than 160,000 users of a telecommunications operator in China and examine the effectiveness of different referral reward schemes. We find that referral programs are most successful when senders are incentivized with uncertain rewards and recipients are guaranteed certain rewards. Specifically, introducing uncertainty in the sender’s reward leads to a 20.9% increase in total referrals with recipients of these invitations more likely to engage in subsequent referrals and profitable in-app activities. In contrast, uncertainty in the recipient’s reward results in a 12.3% decrease in total referrals with invited recipients showing a lower propensity to make further referrals and reduced postreferral engagement. Additional online experiments identify distinct mechanisms driving these asymmetric effects: For senders, the uncertainty alleviates feelings of guilt, enhancing referral sharing and, thus, increasing the total number of referrals. For recipients, the adverse effects of uncertainty stem primarily from diminished perceptions of fairness and social pressure, and these deter engagement in the referral process. Our study sheds light on the complex dynamics of reward uncertainty in referral programs, offering novel insights into how it can be optimized to foster more engaged referral networks. This paper was accepted by Anindya Ghose, information systems. Funding: A.T. Li acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72301269 and 72332007] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant WK2040000085]. R. Belo acknowledges funding by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/00124/2025, UID/PRR/124/2025, Nova School of Business and Economics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/00124/2025 ) and LISBOA2030 (DataLab2030 - LISBOA2030-FEDER-01314200). T. Li acknowledges support from the Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) Convergence AI, Data & Digitalisation (Convergence AI Lab – Immersive Tech) Gravitation Program Public Values in the Algorithmic Society (AlgoSoc). Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05685 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05685
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Reward Uncertainty Encourage Social Referrals? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Rodrigo Belo, Andy Tao Li, Ting Li
Management Science
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Can Reward Uncertainty Encourage Social Referrals? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Rodrigo Belo, Andy Tao Li, Ting Li
article en

Abstract

Social referral programs, in which individuals recommend products or services within their networks in return for rewards, have been widely adopted across digital platforms. This study explores the impact of incorporating uncertainty into the rewards of such programs, focusing on how senders and recipients perceive and react to uncertain rewards. We run a randomized experiment involving more than 160,000 users of a telecommunications operator in China and examine the effectiveness of different referral reward schemes. We find that referral programs are most successful when senders are incentivized with uncertain rewards and recipients are guaranteed certain rewards. Specifically, introducing uncertainty in the sender’s reward leads to a 20.9% increase in total referrals with recipients of these invitations more likely to engage in subsequent referrals and profitable in-app activities. In contrast, uncertainty in the recipient’s reward results in a 12.3% decrease in total referrals with invited recipients showing a lower propensity to make further referrals and reduced postreferral engagement. Additional online experiments identify distinct mechanisms driving these asymmetric effects: For senders, the uncertainty alleviates feelings of guilt, enhancing referral sharing and, thus, increasing the total number of referrals. For recipients, the adverse effects of uncertainty stem primarily from diminished perceptions of fairness and social pressure, and these deter engagement in the referral process. Our study sheds light on the complex dynamics of reward uncertainty in referral programs, offering novel insights into how it can be optimized to foster more engaged referral networks. This paper was accepted by Anindya Ghose, information systems. Funding: A.T. Li acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72301269 and 72332007] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant WK2040000085]. R. Belo acknowledges funding by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/00124/2025, UID/PRR/124/2025, Nova School of Business and Economics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/00124/2025 ) and LISBOA2030 (DataLab2030 - LISBOA2030-FEDER-01314200). T. Li acknowledges support from the Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) Convergence AI, Data & Digitalisation (Convergence AI Lab – Immersive Tech) Gravitation Program Public Values in the Algorithmic Society (AlgoSoc). Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05685 .

Management Science
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.