Design as Event: The Ontological Cut — Why Process, Representation, and Computation Misread Design

This paper establishes Design as Event as a discipline-level theoretical position. It argues thatdesign cannot be adequately understood as an activity unfolding within time, but must begrasped as an event through which time itself becomes intelligible for form. Against dominantparadigms that treat design as process, method, representational sequence, or computationalprocedure, the paper introduces an ontological demarcation: the primary unit of design is theevental configuration that institutes a legible present. Within this horizon, form is not an objectprogressively refined by steps, but a contingent stabilization of limits achieved throughmorphogenetic regulation. The virtual operates as a real, structured reserve of potentialsinternal to the event, actively shaping form without being exhausted by actualization. Methodsand tools remain usable, but only as secondary instruments operating within an alreadyconstituted horizon of relevance and coherence. The paper functions as a demarcation text: itclarifies what Design as Event is and is not, and provides institutional criteria for evaluatingrigor beyond workflow success, visual representation, or computational optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781540
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design as Event: The Ontological Cut — Why Process, Representation, and Computation Misread Design

Theodoros G. kostas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Design as Event: The Ontological Cut — Why Process, Representation, and Computation Misread Design

Theodoros G. kostas
article en

Abstract

This paper establishes Design as Event as a discipline-level theoretical position. It argues thatdesign cannot be adequately understood as an activity unfolding within time, but must begrasped as an event through which time itself becomes intelligible for form. Against dominantparadigms that treat design as process, method, representational sequence, or computationalprocedure, the paper introduces an ontological demarcation: the primary unit of design is theevental configuration that institutes a legible present. Within this horizon, form is not an objectprogressively refined by steps, but a contingent stabilization of limits achieved throughmorphogenetic regulation. The virtual operates as a real, structured reserve of potentialsinternal to the event, actively shaping form without being exhausted by actualization. Methodsand tools remain usable, but only as secondary instruments operating within an alreadyconstituted horizon of relevance and coherence. The paper functions as a demarcation text: itclarifies what Design as Event is and is not, and provides institutional criteria for evaluatingrigor beyond workflow success, visual representation, or computational optimization.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.