Continuous prediction of knee and ankle joint angles based on sEMG and hip joint angle fusion signals by NRBO-LSTM network

Surface electromyography (sEMG) serves as a crucial information source for capturing human motion. Joint angle prediction based on sEMG holds significant application value in the field of rehabilitation medicine. This paper investigates continuous prediction of knee and ankle joint angles under three walking modalities (Level walking, Ramp ascent, and Stair ascent). Experimental data comprising sEMG and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals were collected from 10 healthy subjects, with time-domain features extracted from sEMG signals and joint angles calculated from IMU data. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Three input modalities were compared: single 7-channel sEMG signals, single 4-channel sEMG signals, and fused 4-channel sEMG with hip joint angle signals. Comparative analyses were conducted between long short-term memory networks (LSTM), MHA-LSTM(Multi-Head Attention LSTM), and NRBO-LSTM(Newton-Raphson-Based Optimization LSTM) models. Results demonstrate that when using fused signal input with the NRBO-LSTM model, the RMSE values for knee and ankle joint prediction were 4.11 ± 0.74° and 3.48 ± 0.54° (Level walking), 4.33 ± 0.76° and 3.6 ± 0.78° (Ramp ascent), 4.91 ± 1.0° and 4.3 ± 0.7° (Stair ascent), respectively. The MAE values were 3.04 ± 0.6° and 2.66 ± 0.41° (Level walking), 3.37 ± 0.63° and 3.29 ± 0.61(Ramp ascent), 3.74 ± 0.74° and 3.29 ± 0.61° (Stair ascent), respectively. The R 2 values were 0.93 ± 0.03/0.89 ± 0.06 (Level walking), 0.9 ± 0.04/0.76 ± 0.08 (Ramp ascent), and 0.95 ± 0.02/0.64 ± 0.21 (Stair ascent), respectively. This research provides theoretical references for exoskeleton control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2026.109978
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous prediction of knee and ankle joint angles based on sEMG and hip joint angle fusion signals by NRBO-LSTM network

Songbo Zhou, Xinyi Ma, Hui Zhou, Na Ta et al.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Continuous prediction of knee and ankle joint angles based on sEMG and hip joint angle fusion signals by NRBO-LSTM network

Songbo Zhou, Xinyi Ma, Hui Zhou, Na Ta, Chaoming Luo, Yongxin Lv
article en

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) serves as a crucial information source for capturing human motion. Joint angle prediction based on sEMG holds significant application value in the field of rehabilitation medicine. This paper investigates continuous prediction of knee and ankle joint angles under three walking modalities (Level walking, Ramp ascent, and Stair ascent). Experimental data comprising sEMG and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals were collected from 10 healthy subjects, with time-domain features extracted from sEMG signals and joint angles calculated from IMU data. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Three input modalities were compared: single 7-channel sEMG signals, single 4-channel sEMG signals, and fused 4-channel sEMG with hip joint angle signals. Comparative analyses were conducted between long short-term memory networks (LSTM), MHA-LSTM(Multi-Head Attention LSTM), and NRBO-LSTM(Newton-Raphson-Based Optimization LSTM) models. Results demonstrate that when using fused signal input with the NRBO-LSTM model, the RMSE values for knee and ankle joint prediction were 4.11 ± 0.74° and 3.48 ± 0.54° (Level walking), 4.33 ± 0.76° and 3.6 ± 0.78° (Ramp ascent), 4.91 ± 1.0° and 4.3 ± 0.7° (Stair ascent), respectively. The MAE values were 3.04 ± 0.6° and 2.66 ± 0.41° (Level walking), 3.37 ± 0.63° and 3.29 ± 0.61(Ramp ascent), 3.74 ± 0.74° and 3.29 ± 0.61° (Stair ascent), respectively. The R 2 values were 0.93 ± 0.03/0.89 ± 0.06 (Level walking), 0.9 ± 0.04/0.76 ± 0.08 (Ramp ascent), and 0.95 ± 0.02/0.64 ± 0.21 (Stair ascent), respectively. This research provides theoretical references for exoskeleton control.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 120
State Ethnic Affairs Commission (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.