Application of a ZED-2 benchmark experiment to CANDU coolant void reactivity validation

Neutron transport codes are used to calculate the reactivity coefficients needed to predict and model reactor behaviour. Computed reactivity coefficients, such as coolant void reactivity, must be carefully validated against experimental data to ensure their accuracy. This work describes an application of the TSUNAMI nuclear data-based validation methodology to a CANDU Coolant Void Reactivity (CVR) application using experimental data from the Zero Energy Deuterium 2 (ZED-2) reactor. Eight highly correlated measurements from a ZED-2 reactor flooding experiment were used to predict the computational bias of CVR predictions for a CANDU bundle using the TSURFER nuclear data adjustment code. Experimental uncertainties and correlations were determined by evaluating the effects of perturbations to experimental parameters. The post-adjustment χ ν 2 value for the set of experiments was determined to be 1.1. A computational bias due to nuclear data between 0.32 mk and 0.36 mk, depending on bundle burn up, was determined with an average nuclear data uncertainty reduction of 19% relative to the reference data. This work serves as a simple example of how the TSUNAMI framework can be applied to reactivity coefficient validation. • The nuclear data adjustment code TSURFER was applied to a CANDU CVR application. • Data from a ZED-2 flooding experiment yielded a 0.32–0.36 mk CANDU CVR bias. • The ZED-2 data reduced CVR nuclear data uncertainty by 19% . • The applicability of TSURFER to reactivity validation is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2026.112246
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a ZED-2 benchmark experiment to CANDU coolant void reactivity validation

D. R. Novog, J.E. Atfield, Stephen N. Marshall
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

Application of a ZED-2 benchmark experiment to CANDU coolant void reactivity validation

D. R. Novog, J.E. Atfield, Stephen N. Marshall
article en

Abstract

Neutron transport codes are used to calculate the reactivity coefficients needed to predict and model reactor behaviour. Computed reactivity coefficients, such as coolant void reactivity, must be carefully validated against experimental data to ensure their accuracy. This work describes an application of the TSUNAMI nuclear data-based validation methodology to a CANDU Coolant Void Reactivity (CVR) application using experimental data from the Zero Energy Deuterium 2 (ZED-2) reactor. Eight highly correlated measurements from a ZED-2 reactor flooding experiment were used to predict the computational bias of CVR predictions for a CANDU bundle using the TSURFER nuclear data adjustment code. Experimental uncertainties and correlations were determined by evaluating the effects of perturbations to experimental parameters. The post-adjustment χ ν 2 value for the set of experiments was determined to be 1.1. A computational bias due to nuclear data between 0.32 mk and 0.36 mk, depending on bundle burn up, was determined with an average nuclear data uncertainty reduction of 19% relative to the reference data. This work serves as a simple example of how the TSUNAMI framework can be applied to reactivity coefficient validation. • The nuclear data adjustment code TSURFER was applied to a CANDU CVR application. • Data from a ZED-2 flooding experiment yielded a 0.32–0.36 mk CANDU CVR bias. • The ZED-2 data reduced CVR nuclear data uncertainty by 19% . • The applicability of TSURFER to reactivity validation is discussed.

Annals of Nuclear EnergyVol. 232
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.