Drinking motives among patients with alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal study

This current two-year clinical study among adult patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) examined drinking motives and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with alcohol consumption, severity of AUD, and other alcohol-related problems. Enhancement, coping, conformity, and social motives have been found to impact alcohol use, yet longitudinal studies on drinking motives in clinical populations are sparse. This observational study used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Stockholm, Sweden, from 2017 to 2022, including 250 participants with AUD. Data from both treatment groups were included. Assessments of study outcomes were conducted at five time points: at baseline, and after 12, 26, 52, and 104 weeks. Self-report questionnaires and diagnostic interviews were used to assess drinking motives, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and mental health. Instruments used for self-reports included: The Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R SF) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The DMQ-R SF assessed enhancement, coping, conformity, and social motives. The AUDIT assessed self-perceived alcohol problems. Interviews were conducted to assess alcohol consumption using the Timeline Follow-Back method (TLFB) and AUD using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Generalized linear models were used to examine associations between drinking motives (DMQ R-SF) and alcohol-related outcomes (TLFB/AUDIT/AUD by the DSM-5). Reductions in both drinking motives (enhancement 15.6%, coping 23.6%, conformity 15.4%, and social 17.9%) and alcohol-related outcomes (drinks per week 40.5%, number of DSM-5 criteria 50.9%, and AUDIT total score 36.3%) were observed during the study period. Across outcomes, the most prevalent drinking motives was enhancement, followed by social, coping, and conformity motives. Elevated enhancement, coping and social motives were cross-sectionally associated with worse alcohol-related outcomes at different time points, whereas higher conformity motives had links to less alcohol consumption. Higher enhancement motives at baseline predicted a larger reduction in the severity of alcohol problems from baseline to the 104-week follow-up. Enhancement motives were most prevalent among people with AUD, and higher enhancement motives were associated with reductions in AUD severity over time. Motive domains likely play a role in understanding changes in the severity of AUD over time. The original RCT study was registered retrospectively at isrctn.com (14539251), registration date 04/09/2018.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-026-00656-4
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drinking motives among patients with alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal study

Lars Sjödin, Olof Molander, Stina Ingesson, Anders Hammarberg
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Drinking motives among patients with alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal study

Lars Sjödin, Olof Molander, Stina Ingesson, Anders Hammarberg
article en

Abstract

This current two-year clinical study among adult patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) examined drinking motives and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with alcohol consumption, severity of AUD, and other alcohol-related problems. Enhancement, coping, conformity, and social motives have been found to impact alcohol use, yet longitudinal studies on drinking motives in clinical populations are sparse. This observational study used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Stockholm, Sweden, from 2017 to 2022, including 250 participants with AUD. Data from both treatment groups were included. Assessments of study outcomes were conducted at five time points: at baseline, and after 12, 26, 52, and 104 weeks. Self-report questionnaires and diagnostic interviews were used to assess drinking motives, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and mental health. Instruments used for self-reports included: The Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R SF) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The DMQ-R SF assessed enhancement, coping, conformity, and social motives. The AUDIT assessed self-perceived alcohol problems. Interviews were conducted to assess alcohol consumption using the Timeline Follow-Back method (TLFB) and AUD using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Generalized linear models were used to examine associations between drinking motives (DMQ R-SF) and alcohol-related outcomes (TLFB/AUDIT/AUD by the DSM-5). Reductions in both drinking motives (enhancement 15.6%, coping 23.6%, conformity 15.4%, and social 17.9%) and alcohol-related outcomes (drinks per week 40.5%, number of DSM-5 criteria 50.9%, and AUDIT total score 36.3%) were observed during the study period. Across outcomes, the most prevalent drinking motives was enhancement, followed by social, coping, and conformity motives. Elevated enhancement, coping and social motives were cross-sectionally associated with worse alcohol-related outcomes at different time points, whereas higher conformity motives had links to less alcohol consumption. Higher enhancement motives at baseline predicted a larger reduction in the severity of alcohol problems from baseline to the 104-week follow-up. Enhancement motives were most prevalent among people with AUD, and higher enhancement motives were associated with reductions in AUD severity over time. Motive domains likely play a role in understanding changes in the severity of AUD over time. The original RCT study was registered retrospectively at isrctn.com (14539251), registration date 04/09/2018.

Addiction Science & Clinical PracticeVol. 21(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE)
Stockholms Läns Landsting, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Uppsala Universitet, Systembolaget Aktiebolag
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.