Data Publics: An Empirical and Comparative Approach to Datafication

This article presents an empirical and comparative framework for understanding datafication through the lens of data publics. We define data publics as social groups that engage, or might be expected to engage, with data generated about, by, or for them. Through ethnographic case studies conducted in various contexts, including open data, health data, and data activism, this article explores how data initiatives are developed in relation to imagined publics, which ultimately confront actual publics. This study introduces an analytical framework that integrates diverse tensions between conceptions of the public (passive versus agentive, ideal versus empirical, cognitive versus affective) to facilitate a nuanced analysis of data publics. The article emphasizes the complexity inherent in these publics and the ways developers of data initiatives relate to them, and highlights the necessity of examining underlying power dynamics to gain a more in-depth understanding of publics’ agency within the broader landscape of datafication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of communication
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65476/5rtr2n61
Primary Topic
Data Analysis and Archiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Publics: An Empirical and Comparative Approach to Datafication

Alexandre Coutant, Mélanie Millette, Guillaume Latzko-Toth, Florence Millerand
International journal of communication
Data Analysis and Archiving
article

Data Publics: An Empirical and Comparative Approach to Datafication

Alexandre Coutant, Mélanie Millette, Guillaume Latzko-Toth, Florence Millerand
article en

Abstract

This article presents an empirical and comparative framework for understanding datafication through the lens of data publics. We define data publics as social groups that engage, or might be expected to engage, with data generated about, by, or for them. Through ethnographic case studies conducted in various contexts, including open data, health data, and data activism, this article explores how data initiatives are developed in relation to imagined publics, which ultimately confront actual publics. This study introduces an analytical framework that integrates diverse tensions between conceptions of the public (passive versus agentive, ideal versus empirical, cognitive versus affective) to facilitate a nuanced analysis of data publics. The article emphasizes the complexity inherent in these publics and the ways developers of data initiatives relate to them, and highlights the necessity of examining underlying power dynamics to gain a more in-depth understanding of publics’ agency within the broader landscape of datafication.

International journal of communicationVol. 20
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Data Analysis and Archiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.