Accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery with early discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate whether accelerated enhanced recovery protocols increase rates of readmission, emergency department (ED) revisits, reoperation, or complications following colorectal surgery. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024621268). A systematic search was perfomed in major databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes was 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were ED revisits, reoperations, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Thirteen studies involving 40,589 patients were included, with 1,783 patients in the aERPs group and 38,806 in the ERPs group. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in 30-day readmission rates (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55–1.29, p = 0.43), ED revisits (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.42–2.18, p = 0.91), reoperations (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.61–1.54, p = 0.90), or complications (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17–1.32, p = 0.15). Accelerated ERPs with early discharge strategies, appear safe and feasible for selected patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with no increased risk of readmissions, ED visits, reoperations, or complications. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize implementation of aERPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-03977-9
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery with early discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeng‐Fu You, Zhen-Hao Yu, Li-Yang Chan, Liming Wang et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery with early discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jeng‐Fu You, Zhen-Hao Yu, Li-Yang Chan, Liming Wang, Geng-Ping Lin
article en

Abstract

To evaluate whether accelerated enhanced recovery protocols increase rates of readmission, emergency department (ED) revisits, reoperation, or complications following colorectal surgery. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024621268). A systematic search was perfomed in major databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes was 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were ED revisits, reoperations, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Thirteen studies involving 40,589 patients were included, with 1,783 patients in the aERPs group and 38,806 in the ERPs group. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in 30-day readmission rates (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55–1.29, p = 0.43), ED revisits (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.42–2.18, p = 0.91), reoperations (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.61–1.54, p = 0.90), or complications (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17–1.32, p = 0.15). Accelerated ERPs with early discharge strategies, appear safe and feasible for selected patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with no increased risk of readmissions, ED visits, reoperations, or complications. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize implementation of aERPs.

Langenbeck s Archives of SurgeryVol. 411(1)
Chang Gung University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.