Companion Value Co-Creation and Well-Being in Older Adults with Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study in Spain

<b>Background:</b> Companion participation in medical consultations can influence the well-being of older adults with chronic illness, yet the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. This study aimed (1) to examine how companion-reported value co-creation (coproduction and value-in-use) relates to patient-reported multidimensional well-being (psychological, existential, social, and physical), and (2) to test whether these associations vary according to patient and companion characteristics. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional dyadic study of 907 patient-companion pairs (N = 1814) was conducted in Spain prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Companions completed the adapted Spanish Value Co-creation Scale, while patients completed the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R). Construct validity was confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling tested hypothesized relationships using robust maximum-likelihood estimation. <b>Results:</b> The model showed good fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.41, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.041). Companion coproduction was positively associated with patient psychological (β = 0.32), social (β = 0.27), and existential well-being (β = 0.29), but not physical well-being. Value-in-use showed small negative associations (β ≈ -0.10 to -0.15), which may reflect relational strain arising when companions' involvement is excessive or mismatched with patient needs. Coproduction effects were stronger among patients aged ≤75 years. <b>Conclusions:</b> Companion coproduction enhances key dimensions of patient well-being, highlighting its role as a relational resource in clinical practice. Conversely, higher companion value-in-use may signal potential relational strain. These pre-pandemic findings provide a baseline for post-COVID chronic care models that aim to actively involve companions and tailor support according to patient age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14050578
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Companion Value Co-Creation and Well-Being in Older Adults with Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study in Spain

Ana Suárez Vázquez, Ana Belén del Río-Lanza, Leticia Suárez-Álvarez
Healthcare
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Companion Value Co-Creation and Well-Being in Older Adults with Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study in Spain

Ana Suárez Vázquez, Ana Belén del Río-Lanza, Leticia Suárez-Álvarez
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Companion participation in medical consultations can influence the well-being of older adults with chronic illness, yet the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. This study aimed (1) to examine how companion-reported value co-creation (coproduction and value-in-use) relates to patient-reported multidimensional well-being (psychological, existential, social, and physical), and (2) to test whether these associations vary according to patient and companion characteristics. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional dyadic study of 907 patient-companion pairs (N = 1814) was conducted in Spain prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Companions completed the adapted Spanish Value Co-creation Scale, while patients completed the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R). Construct validity was confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling tested hypothesized relationships using robust maximum-likelihood estimation. <b>Results:</b> The model showed good fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.41, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.041). Companion coproduction was positively associated with patient psychological (β = 0.32), social (β = 0.27), and existential well-being (β = 0.29), but not physical well-being. Value-in-use showed small negative associations (β ≈ -0.10 to -0.15), which may reflect relational strain arising when companions' involvement is excessive or mismatched with patient needs. Coproduction effects were stronger among patients aged ≤75 years. <b>Conclusions:</b> Companion coproduction enhances key dimensions of patient well-being, highlighting its role as a relational resource in clinical practice. Conversely, higher companion value-in-use may signal potential relational strain. These pre-pandemic findings provide a baseline for post-COVID chronic care models that aim to actively involve companions and tailor support according to patient age.

HealthcareVol. 14(5)
Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.