Single neuron responses in NCL, MVL, and Wulst during the observation of videos of conspecifics support population feature coding

Social visual processing in vertebrates employs sophisticated neural mechanisms ranging from categorical face cells to distributed sparse coding systems. In primates, recent evidence supports a "tuning landscape" model where neurons signal distances to prototypes in high-dimensional space rather than functioning as simple category detectors. However, social visual processing in non-mammalian animals remains poorly understood. We recorded single-unit activity from three functionally distinct pigeon brain regions-mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL), visual Wulst, and nidopallium caudolaterale (NCL)-while birds viewed dynamic videos of conspecifics and control shapes performing courtship, eating, flying, and walking behaviors. Despite finding visually responsive neurons in all regions, we observed no categorical distinction between conspecific and control stimuli. Instead, population analyses revealed discrete temporal modulations corresponding to specific motion features-bowing, wing-flapping, head-bobbing-suggesting feature-based rather than categorical encoding of visual information. Sound-modulated visual units were significantly more prevalent in MVL than Wulst, indicating earlier multimodal integration in the tectofugal pathway than previously recognized. The absence of differential responses in NCL during passive viewing, contrasting with clear modulation in visual areas, suggests that this region is less involved in the automatic analysis of visual features. These findings suggest that avian visual structures use sparse coding principles that are similar to the visual cortex, where populations encode specific features through coordinated but brief neural responses rather than sustained categorical signals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1736261
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single neuron responses in NCL, MVL, and Wulst during the observation of videos of conspecifics support population feature coding

Sara Santos Silva, Michael Colombo, Daniela Bühn, Paxton Hall et al.
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Single neuron responses in NCL, MVL, and Wulst during the observation of videos of conspecifics support population feature coding

Sara Santos Silva, Michael Colombo, Daniela Bühn, Paxton Hall, Jonas Rose, William Clark
article en

Abstract

Social visual processing in vertebrates employs sophisticated neural mechanisms ranging from categorical face cells to distributed sparse coding systems. In primates, recent evidence supports a "tuning landscape" model where neurons signal distances to prototypes in high-dimensional space rather than functioning as simple category detectors. However, social visual processing in non-mammalian animals remains poorly understood. We recorded single-unit activity from three functionally distinct pigeon brain regions-mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL), visual Wulst, and nidopallium caudolaterale (NCL)-while birds viewed dynamic videos of conspecifics and control shapes performing courtship, eating, flying, and walking behaviors. Despite finding visually responsive neurons in all regions, we observed no categorical distinction between conspecific and control stimuli. Instead, population analyses revealed discrete temporal modulations corresponding to specific motion features-bowing, wing-flapping, head-bobbing-suggesting feature-based rather than categorical encoding of visual information. Sound-modulated visual units were significantly more prevalent in MVL than Wulst, indicating earlier multimodal integration in the tectofugal pathway than previously recognized. The absence of differential responses in NCL during passive viewing, contrasting with clear modulation in visual areas, suggests that this region is less involved in the automatic analysis of visual features. These findings suggest that avian visual structures use sparse coding principles that are similar to the visual cortex, where populations encode specific features through coordinated but brief neural responses rather than sustained categorical signals.

Frontiers in Behavioral NeuroscienceVol. 20
Harvard University (US), Cognitive Research (United States) (US), University of Otago (NZ)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Marsden Fund
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.