Characteristic differences in somatosensory gating between adolescents and adults

<b>Aim of the study</b>: To characterize differences in somatosensory gating associated with maturation, we compared the amplitude ratio of responses to the second stimulus (S2) over the first stimulus (S1) between adolescents and young adults using a paired-pulse stimulation paradigm while recording somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). <b>Methods:</b> Thirteen right-handed adolescent males (14.1 ± 0.3 yrs) and twenty-four adult males (21.2 ± 1.2 yrs) participated. We focused on SEP components at Fz and C3', and sensory gating for each component was quantified as the S2/S1 amplitude. Components showing significant gating were identified within each group. Subsequently, S2/S1 amplitude ratios between groups and bivariate correlations among gated components were examined. <b>Results:</b> Adolescents showed significant gating for N30 at Fz and P22 and P45 at C3', and adults showed significant gating for N30 at Fz and P22 and N60 at C3'. The S2/S1 amplitude ratios for N30 at Fz and P45 at C3' were significantly smaller in adolescents than adults, whereas other components did not differ. Correlations among S2/S1 amplitude ratios were not significant in either group, suggesting component-specific mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adolescents showed stronger frontal N30 gating and a different centroparietal pattern relative to adults, suggesting immature and region-specific inhibitory processes. The absence of correlations among S2/S1 ratios supports the presence of partially independent generator and neurochemical mechanisms across SEP components. These findings provide a developmental profile of somatosensory gating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Somatosensory & Motor Research
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2026.2637442
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristic differences in somatosensory gating between adolescents and adults

Hiroki Nakata, Aoi Mase, Manabu Shibasaki, Masako Nakagawa
Somatosensory & Motor Research
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Characteristic differences in somatosensory gating between adolescents and adults

Hiroki Nakata, Aoi Mase, Manabu Shibasaki, Masako Nakagawa
article en

Abstract

<b>Aim of the study</b>: To characterize differences in somatosensory gating associated with maturation, we compared the amplitude ratio of responses to the second stimulus (S2) over the first stimulus (S1) between adolescents and young adults using a paired-pulse stimulation paradigm while recording somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). <b>Methods:</b> Thirteen right-handed adolescent males (14.1 ± 0.3 yrs) and twenty-four adult males (21.2 ± 1.2 yrs) participated. We focused on SEP components at Fz and C3', and sensory gating for each component was quantified as the S2/S1 amplitude. Components showing significant gating were identified within each group. Subsequently, S2/S1 amplitude ratios between groups and bivariate correlations among gated components were examined. <b>Results:</b> Adolescents showed significant gating for N30 at Fz and P22 and P45 at C3', and adults showed significant gating for N30 at Fz and P22 and N60 at C3'. The S2/S1 amplitude ratios for N30 at Fz and P45 at C3' were significantly smaller in adolescents than adults, whereas other components did not differ. Correlations among S2/S1 amplitude ratios were not significant in either group, suggesting component-specific mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adolescents showed stronger frontal N30 gating and a different centroparietal pattern relative to adults, suggesting immature and region-specific inhibitory processes. The absence of correlations among S2/S1 ratios supports the presence of partially independent generator and neurochemical mechanisms across SEP components. These findings provide a developmental profile of somatosensory gating.

Somatosensory & Motor Research
Nara Women's University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.