Unraveling Fundamental Activity–Stability Relationships in Rutile Oxides

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a key anodic half-cell reaction that accompanies several critical electrochemical reduction reactions of interest to a variety of applications. Despite steady advances in understanding and qualitatively predicting OER activity and selectivity trends, a comprehensive description or prediction of material aqueous (in)-stability and degradation mechanisms remains elusive, even though these processes critically influence device lifetime and economic feasibility. In this work, we investigate the interplay, or lack thereof, between OER activity and material aqueous stability across rutile oxides, with a particular focus on iridium oxide (IrO₂). By applying a Born-Haber cycle, we calculate the thermodynamic driving force for metal dissolution as a function of the applied bias and electrolyte conditions. We apply interpretable machine learning techniques, including principal component analysis and symbolic regression, to analyze trends across rutile oxides and find that key thermodynamic descriptors for OER activity and surface stability are only very weakly correlated. Instead, the local atomic environmentespecially electronic structure signatures for interactions between the active site and its neighborsplays a more important role in predicting material stability. Leveraging these insights, we investigate the impact of doping IrO₂ with a range of transition metals and show that the stability of Ir active sites can be tuned largely independently of its predicted OER activity. These insights lay the foundation for material design to improve stability with respect to corrosion, with the ultimate aim to enhance long-term stability without sacrificing catalytic performance in the OER.