Deformation analysis of adjacent foundation pits in spatially variable soils using borehole-constrained Kriging and random fields

• Stratigraphy-aware random fields quantify spatial variability in adjacent pits. • Homogeneous models underestimate max wall displacements by 28–50%. • Kriging and random field analyses reveal localized high-risk deformation zones. • Simultaneous excavation increases deformation interaction by 30–40%. • Provides a probabilistic workflow for risk assessment in variable soils. Urban deep excavations in soft soils face significant deformation risks due to spatial variability in ground conditions, yet conventional deterministic models often oversimplify this heterogeneity. This study systematically investigates the influence of spatial variability on the deformation behavior of adjacent foundation pits, a prevalent yet underexplored scenario in urban geotechnical projects. Building on established geostatistical approaches, this study introduces stratigraphy-aware random fields that maintain geological consistency while capturing parameter uncertainty. Using field data from Nanjing as a case study, this study compares three modeling approaches: homogeneous, Kriging-interpolated, and random field-based simulations. The findings indicate that conventional homogeneous models underestimate maximum wall displacements by 28-50%, with random field analyses revealing localized high-risk zones undetectable through traditional methods. Excavation sequence analysis further shows that simultaneous excavation increases deformation interactions by 30-40% compared to staggered approaches. These findings provide engineers with a validated workflow for probabilistic risk assessment, particularly for projects requiring deformation control in variable soils. The study advances geotechnical practice by demonstrating how spatial variability quantitatively impacts excavation performance, while the methodology offers adaptable tools for additional geotechnical applications involving soil heterogeneity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109792
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deformation analysis of adjacent foundation pits in spatially variable soils using borehole-constrained Kriging and random fields

Qian Zengzhi, Wei Zhang, Mahdi Shadabfar, Mahboob Anwar Shad et al.
Results in Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Deformation analysis of adjacent foundation pits in spatially variable soils using borehole-constrained Kriging and random fields

Qian Zengzhi, Wei Zhang, Mahdi Shadabfar, Mahboob Anwar Shad, Ya-Dong Xue, Zhai Yuxin
article en

Abstract

• Stratigraphy-aware random fields quantify spatial variability in adjacent pits. • Homogeneous models underestimate max wall displacements by 28–50%. • Kriging and random field analyses reveal localized high-risk deformation zones. • Simultaneous excavation increases deformation interaction by 30–40%. • Provides a probabilistic workflow for risk assessment in variable soils. Urban deep excavations in soft soils face significant deformation risks due to spatial variability in ground conditions, yet conventional deterministic models often oversimplify this heterogeneity. This study systematically investigates the influence of spatial variability on the deformation behavior of adjacent foundation pits, a prevalent yet underexplored scenario in urban geotechnical projects. Building on established geostatistical approaches, this study introduces stratigraphy-aware random fields that maintain geological consistency while capturing parameter uncertainty. Using field data from Nanjing as a case study, this study compares three modeling approaches: homogeneous, Kriging-interpolated, and random field-based simulations. The findings indicate that conventional homogeneous models underestimate maximum wall displacements by 28-50%, with random field analyses revealing localized high-risk zones undetectable through traditional methods. Excavation sequence analysis further shows that simultaneous excavation increases deformation interactions by 30-40% compared to staggered approaches. These findings provide engineers with a validated workflow for probabilistic risk assessment, particularly for projects requiring deformation control in variable soils. The study advances geotechnical practice by demonstrating how spatial variability quantitatively impacts excavation performance, while the methodology offers adaptable tools for additional geotechnical applications involving soil heterogeneity.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Tongji University (CN), Ayatollah Boroujerdi University (IR), China Railway Construction Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.