Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences Between <scp>LI</scp> ‐ <scp>RADS</scp> M Targetoid and <scp>LI</scp> ‐ <scp>RADS</scp> M Nontargetoid Observations: A Comparative Imaging‐Based Study

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70275
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences Between LI ‐ RADS M Targetoid and LI ‐ RADS M Nontargetoid Observations: A Comparative Imaging‐Based Study

Luke Ginocchio, Krishna Prasad Shanbhogue, Indira Laothamatas, Seon-Hi Shin et al.
1 citations
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
31.52
article

Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences Between LI ‐ RADS M Targetoid and LI ‐ RADS M Nontargetoid Observations: A Comparative Imaging‐Based Study

Luke Ginocchio, Krishna Prasad Shanbhogue, Indira Laothamatas, Seon-Hi Shin, Simon Gauvin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
31.52
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.