Limitations of Panoramic Radiograph-Based Fractal Dimension Analysis in Detecting Mandibular Trabecular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Fractal dimension (FD) analysis has been widely applied to medical and dental images to quantify trabecular bone complexity. Panoramic radiographs are routinely used in dental practice; however, the capability of two-dimensional panoramic imaging combined with FD analysis to detect subtle mandibular trabecular alterations associated with systemic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains uncertain. Methodology: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 106 individuals, comprising 53 patients diagnosed with T2DM and 53 non-diabetic controls. Fractal dimension values were calculated using a standardized box-counting algorithm from four anatomically defined mandibular regions of interest (anterior, premolar, molar, and condylar) on panoramic radiographs. Intergroup comparisons of FD values were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of panoramic radiograph-based FD analysis in detecting diabetes-related trabecular differences. Results: No statistically significant differences in fractal dimension values were observed between the T2DM and control groups across all evaluated mandibular regions (p > 0.05). These findings highlight methodological limitations related to image dimensionality, projection geometry, and regional trabecular heterogeneity. Conclusions: Fractal analysis remains a valuable quantitative tool; however, its application to panoramic radiographs should be interpreted cautiously when used to assess systemic bone alterations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fractal and Fractional
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10030144
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of Panoramic Radiograph-Based Fractal Dimension Analysis in Detecting Mandibular Trabecular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Nihat Laçin, Fatih Cabbar, Oya Törün
Fractal and Fractional
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Limitations of Panoramic Radiograph-Based Fractal Dimension Analysis in Detecting Mandibular Trabecular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Nihat Laçin, Fatih Cabbar, Oya Törün
article en

Abstract

Background: Fractal dimension (FD) analysis has been widely applied to medical and dental images to quantify trabecular bone complexity. Panoramic radiographs are routinely used in dental practice; however, the capability of two-dimensional panoramic imaging combined with FD analysis to detect subtle mandibular trabecular alterations associated with systemic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains uncertain. Methodology: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 106 individuals, comprising 53 patients diagnosed with T2DM and 53 non-diabetic controls. Fractal dimension values were calculated using a standardized box-counting algorithm from four anatomically defined mandibular regions of interest (anterior, premolar, molar, and condylar) on panoramic radiographs. Intergroup comparisons of FD values were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of panoramic radiograph-based FD analysis in detecting diabetes-related trabecular differences. Results: No statistically significant differences in fractal dimension values were observed between the T2DM and control groups across all evaluated mandibular regions (p > 0.05). These findings highlight methodological limitations related to image dimensionality, projection geometry, and regional trabecular heterogeneity. Conclusions: Fractal analysis remains a valuable quantitative tool; however, its application to panoramic radiographs should be interpreted cautiously when used to assess systemic bone alterations.

Fractal and FractionalVol. 10(3)
Yeditepe University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.