AI data governance – overlaps between the AI Act and the GDPR

This article examines the overlaps between the AI Act and the GDPR, analysing their overall relationship, conceptual similarities and differences, as well as specific provisions in the AI Act that explicitly overlap with the GDPR. The primary focus of this article lies on AI data governance, with a detailed analysis of the requirements set out in Article 10 AI Act. This provision establishes quality criteria for data and data governance in high-risk AI systems that rely on training AI models with data. The article introduces a novel approach to understanding, interpreting, and applying these criteria in order to facilitate GDPR compliance. As a result, we propose a principles-based framework for AI data governance, categorising the quality criteria in Article 10 into three overarching principles: data accuracy, data transparency, and data fairness. To ensure practical quality assurance, providers of high-risk AI systems should adopt specific methods outlined in the AI Act, such as data-preparation processing operations and the processing of personal data for bias detection and correction. Finally, we propose a cycle-approach to AI data governance, aligning the requirements of Article 10 AI Act with the limitations imposed by the GDPR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Innovation and Technology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2026.2633677
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI data governance – overlaps between the AI Act and the GDPR

Hajo Michael Holtz, Jonas Ledendal
Law Innovation and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI data governance – overlaps between the AI Act and the GDPR

Hajo Michael Holtz, Jonas Ledendal
article en

Abstract

This article examines the overlaps between the AI Act and the GDPR, analysing their overall relationship, conceptual similarities and differences, as well as specific provisions in the AI Act that explicitly overlap with the GDPR. The primary focus of this article lies on AI data governance, with a detailed analysis of the requirements set out in Article 10 AI Act. This provision establishes quality criteria for data and data governance in high-risk AI systems that rely on training AI models with data. The article introduces a novel approach to understanding, interpreting, and applying these criteria in order to facilitate GDPR compliance. As a result, we propose a principles-based framework for AI data governance, categorising the quality criteria in Article 10 into three overarching principles: data accuracy, data transparency, and data fairness. To ensure practical quality assurance, providers of high-risk AI systems should adopt specific methods outlined in the AI Act, such as data-preparation processing operations and the processing of personal data for bias detection and correction. Finally, we propose a cycle-approach to AI data governance, aligning the requirements of Article 10 AI Act with the limitations imposed by the GDPR.

Law Innovation and Technology
Uppsala University (SE), Lund University (SE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.