Understanding COVID-19 attributions: the moderating role of global orientations on prosocial and pro-environmental responses across 35 cultures

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an unprecedented global health crisis, raising important questions about how individuals attribute responsibility to the pandemic and how these attributions shape psychological responses. Drawing on attribution theory, stigma theory, and the globalization orientations framework, the present study examined two moderated mediation models to clarify the associations among attribution (personal attribution and environmental attribution), global orientations (multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection), and psychological responses (stigma, willingness to volunteer, and pro-environmental attitude and behavior) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were 18,171 adults across 35 countries/societies. Results showed that personal attribution of COVID-19 was associated with increased stigma toward infected individuals, which in turn reduced willingness to volunteer. This negative indirect effect was buffered by multicultural acquisition and exacerbated by ethnic protection. Moreover, environmental attribution was positively associated with both self-reported and actual pro-environmental behavior through pro-environmental attitude. Notably, ethnic protection strengthened these positive indirect effects, while multicultural acquisition did not significantly moderate this pathway. These findings provide specific insights into how attributional processes and global orientations jointly affect responses to a global health challenge. The results highlight the importance of fostering multicultural acquisition to reduce stigma and promote volunteering, while also recognizing that even a defensive response to globalization can motivate pro-environmental action when environmental threats are salient. Our research informs the design of anti-stigma programs and pro-environmental initiatives by emphasizing the roles of attribution and global orientations. Future research should employ more robust behavioral measures to further elucidate these complex relationships across diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06709-y
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding COVID-19 attributions: the moderating role of global orientations on prosocial and pro-environmental responses across 35 cultures

Wesley C. H. Wu, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, J. Y. Y. Ng, Bryant P. H. Hui et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Understanding COVID-19 attributions: the moderating role of global orientations on prosocial and pro-environmental responses across 35 cultures

Wesley C. H. Wu, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, J. Y. Y. Ng, Bryant P. H. Hui, Ben C. P. Lam, Algae K. Y. Au, Ting Kin Ng
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an unprecedented global health crisis, raising important questions about how individuals attribute responsibility to the pandemic and how these attributions shape psychological responses. Drawing on attribution theory, stigma theory, and the globalization orientations framework, the present study examined two moderated mediation models to clarify the associations among attribution (personal attribution and environmental attribution), global orientations (multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection), and psychological responses (stigma, willingness to volunteer, and pro-environmental attitude and behavior) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were 18,171 adults across 35 countries/societies. Results showed that personal attribution of COVID-19 was associated with increased stigma toward infected individuals, which in turn reduced willingness to volunteer. This negative indirect effect was buffered by multicultural acquisition and exacerbated by ethnic protection. Moreover, environmental attribution was positively associated with both self-reported and actual pro-environmental behavior through pro-environmental attitude. Notably, ethnic protection strengthened these positive indirect effects, while multicultural acquisition did not significantly moderate this pathway. These findings provide specific insights into how attributional processes and global orientations jointly affect responses to a global health challenge. The results highlight the importance of fostering multicultural acquisition to reduce stigma and promote volunteering, while also recognizing that even a defensive response to globalization can motivate pro-environmental action when environmental threats are salient. Our research informs the design of anti-stigma programs and pro-environmental initiatives by emphasizing the roles of attribution and global orientations. Future research should employ more robust behavioral measures to further elucidate these complex relationships across diverse contexts.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), La Trobe University (AU)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.