Use of clinical vignettes to assess health care professionals’ identification and response to elder abuse in dementia care: a cross-sectional study

Elder abuse affects nearly 15% of older Australians, with those living with dementia at increased risk. This study explored how Australian health care providers identify and respond to different types of elder abuse using six hypothetical vignettes. An online cross-sectional survey (N = 130) evaluated identification and response to instances of elder abuse among geriatricians, general practitioners, and nurse practitioners. Rates of accurate identification were highest for physical (94.3%) and psychological abuse (91.5%), followed by sexual abuse (76.1%), neglect (72.3%), and financial abuse (72%). While most participants provided an appropriate response to psychological abuse, neglect, and financial abuse (100%, 100%, 97.8%), fewer reported an appropriate response to physical (37%) and sexual (67%) abuse. Older age was associated with lower identification accuracy for psychological and physical abuse. General practitioners were more likely to correctly identify neglect. Findings highlight important knowledge and response gaps, underscoring the need for targeted education and training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2636518
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of clinical vignettes to assess health care professionals’ identification and response to elder abuse in dementia care: a cross-sectional study

Lisa Mackenzie, Elise Mansfield, Penelope J Webster, Allison Boyes et al.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Use of clinical vignettes to assess health care professionals’ identification and response to elder abuse in dementia care: a cross-sectional study

Lisa Mackenzie, Elise Mansfield, Penelope J Webster, Allison Boyes, Lucy Leigh, Jamie Bryant, Nola Ries, Caroline Kuhne
article en

Abstract

Elder abuse affects nearly 15% of older Australians, with those living with dementia at increased risk. This study explored how Australian health care providers identify and respond to different types of elder abuse using six hypothetical vignettes. An online cross-sectional survey (N = 130) evaluated identification and response to instances of elder abuse among geriatricians, general practitioners, and nurse practitioners. Rates of accurate identification were highest for physical (94.3%) and psychological abuse (91.5%), followed by sexual abuse (76.1%), neglect (72.3%), and financial abuse (72%). While most participants provided an appropriate response to psychological abuse, neglect, and financial abuse (100%, 100%, 97.8%), fewer reported an appropriate response to physical (37%) and sexual (67%) abuse. Older age was associated with lower identification accuracy for psychological and physical abuse. General practitioners were more likely to correctly identify neglect. Findings highlight important knowledge and response gaps, underscoring the need for targeted education and training.

Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
Washburn University (US), University of Technology (RU), Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.